References

• 2003Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses63,086 cited
• 1986Meta-analysis in clinical trials39,515 cited
• 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
• 2007Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews4,376 cited
• 1991Publication bias in clinical research3,110 cited
• 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials2,754 cited
• 2001The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials2,545 cited
• 2001Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis2,229 cited
• 2008Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias1,544 cited
• 1995Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists1,306 cited
• 2007How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis837 cited
• 1998Summing up evidence: one answer is not always enough655 cited
• 1995Methodologic guidelines for systematic reviews of randomized control trials in health care from the potsdam consultation on meta-analysis574 cited
• 2005The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials 2001