SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

A response to Truscott · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleA response to Truscott

Jean Chandler2004

Article2004

A response to Truscott

103 citations·0/0 files stored·Journal of Second Language Writing

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Writing and Handwriting Education EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning Language Acquisition and Education

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 103 citations exist upstream.

References

1996The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes 2003The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing 2001Error feedback in L2 writing classes 1982Reducing Composition Errors: An Experiment 1986Salience of Feedback on Error and Its Effect on EFL Writing Quality 2000Patterns of Teacher Response to Student Writing in a Multiple-Draft Composition Classroom: Is Content Feedback Followed by Form Feedback the Best Method?1991An Experiment in the Relationship of Types of Written Feedback to the Development of Second-Language Writing Skills 2012Teacher response to student writing: focus on form versus content

Cited by

2012Feedback on the Feedback: Sociocultural Interpretation of Saudi ESL Learners’ Opinions about Writing Feedback 2005Process Writing and Communicative-Task-Based Instruction: Many Common Features, but More Common Limitations?2010Further thoughts on Anthony Bruton’s critique of the correction debate 2011Correcting students’ written grammatical errors: The effects of negotiated versus nonnegotiated feedback

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2011THE EFFECTIVENESS OF FEEDBACK FOR L1‐ENGLISH AND L2‐WRITING DEVELOPMENT: A META‐ANALYSISarticle · 12 shared references 2019The effects of written corrective feedbackarticle · 12 shared references 2007Policies and Practices in Foreign Language Writing at the College Level: Survey Results and Implicationsarticle · 12 shared references 2012A reflection on ‘the language learning potential’ of written CFarticle · 11 shared references 2008The role of teacher’s corrective feedback in improving Iranian EFL learners’ writing accuracy over time: is learner’s mother tongue relevant?chapter · 11 shared references 2010Written Corrective Feedback: The Practitioners’ Perspectivearticle · 11 shared references

Details

Year2004

Typearticle

Published2004-06-03

VenueJournal of Second Language Writing

ISSN-L1060-3743

Languageen

Citations103

Files0 public / 0

ShelfWriting and Handwriting Education

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.jslw.2004.05.001

openalex_workW2070657654

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2007

Vocabulary learning from dictionary referencing and language feedback in EFL translational writing

2010Some thoughts on Anthony Bruton’s critique of the correction debate

2021Individual and collaborative processing of written corrective feedback affects second language writing accuracy and revision

2013The Pedagogy of Error Correction: Surviving the Written Corrective Feedback Challenge