Predicting Accuracy of Early Cost Estimates Based on Estimate Quality

Garold D. Oberlender · Steven M. Trost

166 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Construction Engineering and Management

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Construction Project Management and Performance Capital Investment and Risk Analysis Value Engineering and Management

Abstract

The accuracy of an estimate is measured by how well the estimated cost compares to the actual total installed cost. The accuracy of an early estimate depends on four determinants: (1) who was involved in preparing the estimate; (2) how the estimate was prepared; (3) what was known about the project; and (4) other factors considered while preparing the estimate. This paper presents results of a research effort that developed an estimate scoring system to measure the impact of these four determinants on estimate accuracy. The estimate scoring system consists of 45 elements and is organized into 4 divisions. Data were collected from 67 projects, representing $5.6 billion in total installed costs, and used to correlate the estimate scores with estimated versus actual costs. Statistical analyses determined the relative influence of the 45 elements, based on collected project data. The results showed a significant correlation between the estimate score and the accuracy of the estimate. Computer software, the Estimate Score Program (ESP), was developed to automate the scoring procedure, assess estimate accuracy, and predict contingency, based on historical cost data. The estimator can enter the base estimate into ESP and then rate the estimate, relative to each of the 45 elements. ESP automatically calculates the estimate score, as the user rates each element. The user can query the ESP historical database to view the estimate scores and estimate accuracy of similar projects. A cumulative probability S-curve, generated by ESP, is based on projects selected in the query and the estimate score of interest. The user can also predict the cost range—upper and lower limits—of a desired confidence level. ESP can be used to “check” the amount of contingency determined by other methods, as well as a method of predicting its own contingency.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 166 citations exist upstream.

References

1981Understanding cost growth and performance shortfalls in pioneer process plants

Cited by

2014Using Intelligent Techniques in Construction Project Cost Estimation: 10-Year Survey 2014Understanding the Landscape of Overruns in Transport Infrastructure Projects 2007Application of Support Vector Machines in Assessing Conceptual Cost Estimates 2008Parametric Range Estimating of Building Costs Using Regression Models and Bootstrap 2008AHP- and simulation-based budget determination procedure for public building construction projects 2011Combination of Project Cost Forecasts in Earned Value Management 2018Factors affecting the accuracy of cost estimate: case of Jordan 2005Investigation of Bid Price Competition Measured through Prebid Project Estimates, Actual Bid Prices, and Number of Bidders

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.