SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Dashboard Shelves Open access My library Inbox Notes Write Learn Alerts

More

Ask your library Notifications Quick cite Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Arguments for and Against Standardized Mean Differences (Effect Sizes) · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleArguments for and Against Standardized Mean Differences (Effect Sizes)

Peter Cummings2011

Article2011

Arguments for and Against Standardized Mean Differences (Effect Sizes)

73 citations·0/0 files stored·Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials Statistical Methods in Epidemiology

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 73 citations exist upstream.

References

1988Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis 2021Introduction to Meta‐Analysis 1981Distribution Theory for Glass's Estimator of Effect Size and Related Estimators 1976Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research 2001Statistical Methods for Examining Heterogeneity and Combining Results from Several Studies in Meta‐Analysis 1962The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review.2000Methods for Meta-Analysis in Medical Research 1987QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN THE REVIEW OF EPIDEMIOLOGIC LITERATURE1

Cited by

2015Sleep Differences Among Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders and Typically Developing Peers 2024Absolute and relative outcomes of psychotherapies for eight mental disorders: a systematic review and meta‐analysis 2021The effects of psychological treatments of depression in children and adolescents on response, reliable change, and deterioration: a systematic review and meta-analysis 2024Comparisons of the mean differences and standardized mean differences for continuous outcome measures on the same scale 2020

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2015The meta‐analytic big bangarticle · 7 shared references 1998Systematic reviews of trials and other studies.article · 6 shared references 1986Chapter 11: Issues in Meta-Analysisarticle · 6 shared references 2018The Robustness of the Corporate Social and Financial Performance Relation: A Second‐Order Meta‐Analysisarticle · 5 shared references 1991A practitioner's guide to meta‐analysisreview · 5 shared references 2011Assessment of the quality of meta-analysis in agronomyarticle · 5 shared references

Details

Year2011

Typearticle

Published2011-07-01

VenueArchives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine

ISSN-L1072-4710

Languageen

Citations73

Files0 public / 0

ShelfMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Identifiers

doi10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.97

openalex_workW2071783720

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

Search and Selection Procedures of Literature Reviews in Behavior Analysis

2021Meta‐regression methods to characterize evidence strength using meaningful‐effect percentages conditional on study characteristics

2021Has the time come to stop using the “standardised mean difference”?

2019Standardized Effect Sizes and Image-Based Meta-Analytical Approaches for fMRI Data