SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Trust and Authority in Scholarly Communications in the Light of the Digital Transition: setting the scene for a major study
0 references·16 citing·54 second hopsampled
Trust and Authority in Scholarly Communications in the Light of the Digital Transition: setting the scene for a major study (2014)Trust and Authority in Scholarly Communic…Identification of retracted publications and completeness of retraction notices in public health (2024)Identification of retracted p…The changed – and changing – landscape of serials publishing: Review of the literature on emerging models (2020)The changed – and changing – …Credibility of preprints: an interdisciplinary survey of researchers (2020)Credibility of preprints: an …Scholarly reputation building in the digital age: an activity-specific approach. Review article (2019)Scholarly reputation building…Preprints and Scholarly Communication: An Exploratory Qualitative Study of Adoption, Practices, Drivers and Barriers (2019)Preprints and Scholarly Commu…Researchers’ online visibility: tensions of visibility, trust and reputation (2018)Researchers’ online visibilit…Academic communities (2018)Academic communitiesThe effects of the research excellence framework research impact agenda on early- and mid-career researchers in library and information science (2017)The effects of the research e…Early career researchers: Scholarly behaviour and the prospect of change (2017)Early career researchers: Sch…Academics’ attitudes towards peer review in scholarly journals and the effect of role and discipline (2017)Academics’ attitudes towards …What Motivates Authors of Scholarly Articles? The Importance of Journal Attributes and Potential Audience on Publication Choice (2016)What Motivates Authors of Sch…Trustworthiness and authority of scholarly information in a digital age: Results of an international questionnaire (2015)Trustworthiness and authority…The Distribution of the Asymptotic Number of Citations to Sets of Publications by a Researcher or from an Academic Department Are Consistent with a Discrete Lognormal Model (2015)The Distribution of the Asymp…Making Open Access work (2015)Making Open Access workDo Younger Researchers Assess Trustworthiness Differently when Deciding what to Read and Cite and where to Publish? (2015)Do Younger Researchers Assess…Changes in the digital scholarly environment and issues of trust: An exploratory, qualitative analysis (2015)Changes in the digital schola…An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Theory and practise of the g-index (2006)The time dimension of science: Connecting the past to the future (2017)Comprehensive Researcher Achievement Model (CRAM): a framework for measuring researcher achievement, impact and influence derived from a systematic literature review of metrics and models (2019)Three dimensions of scientific impact (2020)An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust (1995)An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust (1995)What Trust Means in E-Commerce Customer Relationships: An Interdisciplinary Conceptual Typology (2001)A global questionnaire survey of the scholarly communication attitudes and behaviours of early career researchers (2020)Academic tribes and territories (1989)Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping (2009)Visualizing Bibliometric Networks (2014)“Let the community decide”? The vision and reality of soundness-only peer review in open-access mega-journals (2017)Open Access in Theory and Practice (2020)Ciencia abierta: un modelo con piezas por encajar (2021)The Google generation: the information behaviour of the researcher of the future (2008)Assessing the Future Landscape of Scholarly Communication: An Exploration of Faculty Values and Needs in Seven Disciplines (2010)Social media use in the research workflow (2011)Identifying publications in questionable journals in the context of performance-based research funding (2019)How is open access publishing going down with early career researchers? An international, multi-disciplinary study (2020)Millennial researchers in a metric-driven scholarly world: An international study (2020)Scholarly communication in the digital environment: what do authors want? (2004)The hybrid model for open access publication of scholarly articles: A failed experiment? (2012)Filling the citation gap: measuring the multidimensional impact of the academic book at institutional level with PlumX (2017)PlumX As a Potential Tool to Assess the Macroscopic Multidimensional Impact of Books (2017)Open Access to the Scientific Journal Literature: Situation 2009 (2010)Publication fees in open access publishing: Sources of funding and factors influencing choice of journal (2011)The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)Acceptance rates of scholarly peer-reviewed journals: A literature survey (2019)More journal articles and fewer books: Publication practices in the social sciences in the 2010’s (2022)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science (2013)Authorial and institutional stratification in open access publishing: the case of global health research (2018)The Open-Access Availability of Criminological Research to Practitioners and Policy Makers (2020)Diffusion of innovations (2003)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Bias in peer review (2012)Preprints as accelerator of scholarly communication: An empirical analysis in Mathematics (2020)Real-Time Bibliometrics: Dimensions as a Resource for Analyzing Aspects of COVID-19 (2021)Motivations, concerns and selection biases when posting preprints: A survey of bioRxiv authors (2022)Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate (1992)Assessment, evaluations, and definitions of research impact: A review (2013)Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network (2014)Open Access Perceptions, Strategies, and Digital Literacies: A Case Study of a Scholarly-Led Journal (2020)A credit-like rating system to determine the legitimacy of scientific journals and publishers (2021)Overlay journals: A study of the current landscape (2022)Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. (1977)Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. (1980)Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance (2007)Caution, Preprint! Brief Explanations Allow Nonscientists to Differentiate Between Preprints and Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles (2022)Preprints (2022)To preprint or not to preprint: A global researcher survey (2024)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2020Credibility of preprints: an interdisciplinary survey of researchers83 cited
  • 2017Early career researchers: Scholarly behaviour and the prospect of change82 cited
  • 2015Making Open Access work79 cited
  • 2019Preprints and Scholarly Communication: An Exploratory Qualitative Study of Adoption, Practices, Drivers and Barriers79 cited
  • 2016What Motivates Authors of Scholarly Articles? The Importance of Journal Attributes and Potential Audience on Publication Choice77 cited
  • 2015Trustworthiness and authority of scholarly information in a digital age: Results of an international questionnaire75 cited
  • 2015The Distribution of the Asymptotic Number of Citations to Sets of Publications by a Researcher or from an Academic Department Are Consistent with a Discrete Lognormal Model47 cited
  • 2015Changes in the digital scholarly environment and issues of trust: An exploratory, qualitative analysis40 cited
  • 2015Do Younger Researchers Assess Trustworthiness Differently when Deciding what to Read and Cite and where to Publish?40 cited
  • 2020The changed – and changing – landscape of serials publishing: Review of the literature on emerging models39 cited
  • 2019Scholarly reputation building in the digital age: an activity-specific approach. Review article38 cited
  • 2018Academic communities37 cited
  • 2018Researchers’ online visibility: tensions of visibility, trust and reputation

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

35 cited
  • 2017The effects of the research excellence framework research impact agenda on early- and mid-career researchers in library and information science33 cited
  • 2024Identification of retracted publications and completeness of retraction notices in public health32 cited
  • 2017Academics’ attitudes towards peer review in scholarly journals and the effect of role and discipline31 cited