Article2011

Consumers' perceptions of the dimensions of brand personality

Natalia Mæhle · Cele C. Otnes · Magne Supphellen

168 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Consumer Behaviour

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification Marketing and Advertising Strategies Consumer Retail Behavior Studies

Abstract

Abstract Brand personality (human‐like characteristics of a brand) has been a popular topic in the marketing literature for over 50 years. However, there is a lack of consumer‐focused studies investigating what factors shape perceptions of brand personality. To address this gap, the purpose of the current study is to understand how consumers form their perceptions of the different dimensions of brand personality identified in Aaker's scale (sincerity, excitement, competence, sophistication and ruggedness), and what product or brand characteristics influence these perceptions. Sixty‐six interviews were conducted with graduate students, who were asked to discuss which brands reflected the specific dimensions of brand personality in Aaker's scale. As a result, we identify the kinds of brands consumers perceive as typical for each personality dimension, discover their common characteristics and explain the reasons why some brands are strongly associated with a particular dimension and some are not. Our findings indicate that specific brand personality dimensions are associated with particular product categories. However, brands mentioned as strong on respective personality dimensions share commonalities beyond just a product category. For instance, sincere brands share family‐related associations and high morals, exciting brands offer consumers the opportunity to experience exciting feelings and are related to special ‘exciting’ occasions, competent brands are mostly associated with expertise and quality, sophisticated brands are usually of feminine nature, whereas rugged brands are of masculine nature. Moreover, we find that brands which consumers perceive as lacking on a particular personality dimension also share common attributes. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 168 citations exist upstream.

References

1968The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research.1968The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research 1993Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity 2025Advances in Consumer Research 1988Possessions and the Extended Self 1998Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research 2010Satisfaction: a behavioral perspective on the consumer 1988The Long Interview

Cited by

2019Attracting applicants through the organization's social media page: Signaling employer brand personality 2019Functional brand qualities and perceived value: The mediating role of brand experience and brand personality 2016Too Exciting to Fail, Too Sincere to Succeed: The Effects of Brand Personality on Sensory Disconfirmation 2017Users of the main smartphone operating systems (iOS, Android) differ only little in personality 2015Brand personality and brand equity: evidence from the sportswear industry

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.