Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Juror judgment as information integration: Combining evidential and nonevidential information.

10 references·16 citing·38 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1967Attribution theory in social psychology3,831 cited
1965From Acts To Dispositions The Attribution Process In Person Perception3,423 cited
1968Readings in Attitude Theory and Measurement2,124 cited
1961FORMING IMPRESSIONS OF PERSONALITY2,081 cited
1969Theories of cognitive consistency : a sourcebook1,989 cited
1968Likableness ratings of 555 personality-trait words.1,638 cited
1971Integration theory and attitude change.905 cited
1971The American Jury551 cited
1969The influence of the character of the criminal and his victim on the decisions of simulated jurors269 cited
1973The defendant's dilemma: Effects of jurors' attitudes and authoritarianism on judicial decisions.200 cited

Cited by

2009In the Eye of the Beholder: Do Behavior and Character Affect Victim and Perpetrator Responsibility for Acquaintance Rape?188 cited
2004The prejudicial nature of victim impact statements: Implications for capital sentencing policy.74 cited
1987Children on the Witness Stand: A Communication/Persuasion Analysis of Jurors’ Reactions to Child Witnesses72 cited
1976Apparent weight of evidence, decision criteria, and confidence ratings in juror decision making.71 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2004

Timing of Eyewitness Expert Testimony, Jurors' Need for Cognition, and Case Strength as Determinants of Trial Verdicts.

61 cited

1978Is Justice Really Blind?–The Influence of Litigant Physical Attractiveness on Juridical Judgment161 cited

2006Socioeconomic Status and Belief in a Just World: Sentencing of Criminal Defendants148 cited

2012Are the effects of juvenile offender stereotypes maximized or minimized by jury deliberation?45 cited

1977Guilty or Not Guilty? A Look at the “Simulated” Jury Paradigm145 cited

1997Media coverage and public opinion of the O. J. Simpson trial: Implications for the criminal justice system44 cited

2010Getting to (not) guilty: examining jurors' deliberative processes in, and beyond, the context of a mock rape trial43 cited

1982Biases In Trials Involving Defendants Charged With Multiple Offenses141 cited

1985The Influence of Eyewitness Nonidentifications on Mock‐Jurors' Judgments of a Court Case134 cited

1977Improving Comprehension for Jury Instructions34 cited

1991Law Reform by Courts, Legislatures, and Commissions Following Empirical Research on Jury Instructions33 cited

1976Effect of an escaped accomplice on the punishment assigned to a criminal defendant.31 cited