A Critical Evaluation of the Incident Command System and NIMS

Dick A Buck · Joseph Trainor · Benigno Emilio Aguirre

253 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Disaster Management and Resilience Disaster Response and Management Safety and Risk Management

Abstract

This paper aims to draw a series of generalizable conclusions regarding the incident command system (ICS) as a management tool for structuring the activity of disaster response agencies at the site of disasters in the United States. It identifies the basic elements of the system and makes some observations regarding its range of applicability. The analysis is drawn from several sources of information regarding the use of ICS in nine different disasters in which Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Urban Search and Rescue (US&R) Taskforces participated. Results suggest the applicability of ICS in a range of emergency response activities, but point to the importance of context as a largely un-examined precondition to effective ICS. Our findings indicate that ICS is a partial solution to the question of how to organize the societal response in the aftermath of disasters; the system is more or less effective depending on specific characteristics of the incident and the organizations in which it is used. It works best when those utilizing it are part of a community, when the demands being responded to are routine to them, and when social and cultural emergence is at a minimum. ICS does not create a universally applicable bureaucratic organization among responders but rather is a mechanism for inter-organizational coordination designed to impose order on certain dimensions of the chaotic organizational environments of disasters. We conclude by extending our observations from the USAR context to the reconstruction, recovery, and mitigation phases of disasters in order to illuminate the general limitations of the approach as an all-encompassing model for disaster-related organizational and inter-organizational functioning and coordination. Our final conclusions suggest that the present-day efforts in the National Incident Management System (NIMS) to use ICS as a comprehensive principle of disaster management probably will not succeed as intended.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 253 citations exist upstream.

References

1986Images of Organization 2001Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions 1977Response to Social Crisis and Disaster 1994Community Emergency Planning: False Assumptions and Inappropriate Analogies 1991Politics and the Theory of Organization 1976Complex Organizations: A Sociological Perspective.1994Working with the media

Cited by

2017The Structure of Effective Governance of Disaster Response Networks: Insights From the Field 2013A systematic review of the potential hurdles of interoperability to the emergency services in major incidents: recommendations for solutions and alternatives 2009Crisis Navigation: Lessons from History for the Crisis Manager in Chief 2022Disruptive crisis management: lessons from managing a hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic 2012A Coordinated Mental Health Crisis Response: Lessons Learned From Three Colorado School Shootings 2018Dynamic resource allocation and coordination for high-load crisis volunteer management

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.