Cochrane Systematic Reviews in Acupuncture: Methodological Diversity in Database Searching

Amit Sood · Richa Sood · Brent A. Bauer · Jon O. Ebbert

29 citations0/0 files storedThe Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews scientometrics and bibliometrics research Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since the early 1970s, the efficacy of acupuncture for treating clinical conditions has been evaluated in several hundred randomized trials. Results from these trials have been synthesized in systematic reviews. A well-designed systematic review provides the highest level of evidence for establishing the efficacy of a clinical intervention. OBJECTIVES: The present study assesses the source of original literature contributing to Cochrane reviews on acupuncture. Databases searched to retrieve original studies are evaluated. The distribution of controlled trials in acupuncture across different topic areas and journals, the ability of the reviews to provide conclusive results, and the proportion of original studies indexed with MEDLINE are evaluated. METHODS: Systematic reviews on acupuncture were extracted from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. The key search term used was "acupuncture." When more than one systematic review was retrieved on the same topic, the most recent review was included. Indexing of individual clinical trials with MEDLINE was searched using the Single Citation Matcher in PubMed. RESULTS: A total of 94 papers were retrieved from the Cochrane database, of which 10 were included in the analysis. The most common subject areas were related to chronic pain. Considerable heterogeneity was observed in the number of databases searched (median 5, range 3-12). A total of 69% (74/108) papers were indexed with PubMed. Only 13% (14/108) of the papers were published in the primary acupuncture journals. Conclusive statements about the efficacy of acupuncture were made in only 2 of the 10 systematic reviews. CONCLUSIONS: Considerable methodological diversity exists in the comprehensiveness of database searches for Cochrane systematic reviews on acupuncture. This diversity makes the reviews prone to bias and adds another layer of complexity in interpreting the acupuncture literature.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 29 citations exist upstream.

References

1997Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test 1997Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions 1997Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German 2002Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical study 1998Methodology and Reports of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses 2003The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews 2000Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on treatment of asthma: critical evaluation 2001Quality of Cochrane reviews: assessment of sample from 1998

Cited by

2009Searching for Controlled Trials of Complementary and Alternative Medicine: A Comparison of 15 Databases 2007Searching for CAM Evidence: An Evaluation of Therapy-Specific Search Strategies 2006Reporting bias and other biases affecting systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a methodological commentary 2007Evaluating anecdotes and case reports.2012Impact of Including Korean Randomized Controlled Trials in Cochrane Reviews of Acupuncture

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.