SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Cochrane Systematic Reviews in Acupuncture: Methodological Diversity in Database Searching
9 references·8 citing·47 second hop
Cochrane Systematic Reviews in Acupuncture: Methodological Diversity in Database Searching (2005)Cochrane Systematic Reviews in Acupunctur…The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews (2003)The inclusion of reports of r…Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical study (2002)Direction and impact of langu…A Comparison of the Quality of Cochrane Reviews and Systematic Reviews Published in Paper-Based Journals (2002)A Comparison of the Quality o…Quality of Cochrane reviews: assessment of sample from 1998 (2001)Quality of Cochrane reviews: …Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on treatment of asthma: critical evaluation (2000)Systematic reviews and meta-a…Methodology and Reports of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (1998)Methodology and Reports of Sy…Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions (1997)Systematic Reviews: Synthesis…Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German (1997)Language bias in randomised c…Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Bias in meta-analysis detecte…A search of only four key databases would identify most randomized controlled trials of acupuncture: A meta‐epidemiological study (2022)A search of only four key dat…Hope in the Context of Pain and Palliative Care (2018)Hope in the Context of Pain a…Impact of Including Korean Randomized Controlled Trials in Cochrane Reviews of Acupuncture (2012)Impact of Including Korean Ra…Hope in the Context of Pain and Palliative Care (2011)Hope in the Context of Pain a…Searching for Controlled Trials of Complementary and Alternative Medicine: A Comparison of 15 Databases (2009)Searching for Controlled Tria…Searching for CAM Evidence: An Evaluation of Therapy-Specific Search Strategies (2007)Searching for CAM Evidence: A…Evaluating anecdotes and case reports. (2007)Evaluating anecdotes and case…Reporting bias and other biases affecting systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a methodological commentary (2006)Reporting bias and other bias…Systematic reviews need systematic searchers. (2005)How to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE: ten years on. (2006)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Systematic reviews in integrative medicine: A clinician's guide to publication (2015)Database coverage and their use in systematic reviews regarding spinal manipulative therapy: an exploratory study (2022)Methodological quality of systematic reviews on Chinese herbal medicine: a methodological survey (2022)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Sex Differences in Insomnia: A Meta-Analysis (2006)Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)Chapter 10: Addressing reporting biases (2011)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Decision Making in Health and Medicine: Integrating Evidence and Values (2001)Improving the evaluation of therapeutic interventions in multiple sclerosis: the role of new psychometric methods (2009)Excluding non-English publications from evidence-syntheses did not change conclusions: a meta-epidemiological study (2019)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Mind-Body Medicine: State of the Science, Implications for Practice (2003)Assessment of methodological quality of primary studies by systematic reviews: results of the metaquality cross sectional study (2005)Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 3: Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Randomized Trials (2009)Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (1987)Validation of an index of the quality of review articles (1991)Methodological quality of systematic reviews of animal studies: a survey of reviews of basic research (2006)The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: An independent appraisal* (2007)Evidence-based or biased? The quality of published reviews of evidence-based practices (2008)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Growth and decentralization of the medical literature: implications for evidence-based medicine. (2005)High prevalence but low impact of data extraction and reporting errors were found in Cochrane systematic reviews (2005)Risk of bias in overviews of reviews: a scoping review of methodological guidance and four‐item checklist (2017)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results (2009)A meta-analytic review of the association between perceived social support and depression in childhood and adolescence. (2016)What five decades of research tells us about the effects of youth psychological therapy: A multilevel meta-analysis and implications for science and practice. (2017)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)What contributions do languages other than English make on the results of meta-analyses? (2000)Religion/spirituality and adolescent health outcomes: a review (2006)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2008)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1997Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test56,637 cited
  • 1997Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions2,184 cited
  • 1997Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German1,029 cited
  • 2002Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical study891 cited
  • 1998Methodology and Reports of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses534 cited
  • 2003The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews499 cited
  • 2000Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on treatment of asthma: critical evaluation263 cited
  • 2001Quality of Cochrane reviews: assessment of sample from 1998159 cited
  • 2002A Comparison of the Quality of Cochrane Reviews and Systematic Reviews Published in Paper-Based Journals111 cited

Cited by

  • 2009Searching for Controlled Trials of Complementary and Alternative Medicine: A Comparison of 15 Databases23 cited
  • 2007Searching for CAM Evidence: An Evaluation of Therapy-Specific Search Strategies19 cited
  • 2006Reporting bias and other biases affecting systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a methodological commentary14 cited
  • 2007Evaluating anecdotes and case reports.13 cited
  • 2012Impact of Including Korean Randomized Controlled Trials in Cochrane Reviews of Acupuncture

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

11 cited
  • 2022A search of only four key databases would identify most randomized controlled trials of acupuncture: A meta‐epidemiological study10 cited
  • 2011Hope in the Context of Pain and Palliative Care6 cited
  • 2018Hope in the Context of Pain and Palliative Care4 cited