References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

• 1978The ‘Parson's Tale’ and the Quitting of the ‘Canterbury Tales’130 cited
• 1986The Wife of Bath’s Passing Fancy60 cited
• 1988The New Reader and Female Textuality in Two Early Commentaries on Chaucer53 cited
• 2003Reclaiming the Pardoners49 cited
• 2006“What Man Artow?”: Authorial Self-Definition in the Tale of Sir Thopas and the Tale of Melibee44 cited
• 2003Transgressive Word and Image in Chaucer's Enshrined Coillons Passage34 cited
• 1981The Order of The Canterbury Tales34 cited
• 2020Paper in Medieval England34 cited
• 1992Discourse and the Problem of Closure in theCanterbury Tales31 cited
• 2016Chaucer’s Pardoner and the Jews29 cited
• 1987Chaucer’s Two Ways: The Pilgrimage Frame of The Canterbury Tales28 cited
• 2019Literary Value and Social Identity in the Canterbury Tales25 cited
• 2016Retraction and Re-Collection: Chaucer’s Apocalyptic Self-Examination25 cited
• 1987Pax Poetica: On the Pacifism of Chaucer and Gower20 cited
• 2005Social Aesthetics and the Emergence of Civic Discourse from the Shipman's Tale to Melibee