SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Cancer, meta-analysis and reporting biases: the case of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents
16 references·0 citing·37 second hop
Cancer, meta-analysis and reporting biases: the case of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (2013)Cancer, meta-analysis and reporting biase…SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials (2013)SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defini…Selective Outcome Reporting as a Source of Bias in Reviews of Comparative Effectiveness (2012)Selective Outcome Reporting a…Meta-analyses: what they can and cannot do (2012)Meta-analyses: what they can …(Meta)analyze this: Systematic reviews might lose credibility (2012)(Meta)analyze this: Systemati…Completeness and Changes in Registered Data and Reporting Bias of Randomized Controlled Trials in ICMJE Journals after Trial Registration Policy (2011)Completeness and Changes in R…Unpublished data can be of value in systematic reviews of adverse effects: methodological overview (2010)Unpublished data can be of va…The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews (2010)The impact of outcome reporti…Finding studies on reboxetine: a tale of hide and seek (2010)Finding studies on reboxetine…Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)Dissemination and publication…Clinical trial registration: looking back and moving ahead (2007)Clinical trial registration: …Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors (2005)Identifying outcome reporting…Value of updating a systematic review in surgery using individual patient data (2004)Value of updating a systemati…Clinical Trial Registration: A Statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2004)Clinical Trial Registration: …Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2004)Clinical trial registration: …Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects (1997)Publication bias: evidence of…The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)The cochrane database of syst…Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Publication bias: What are the challenges and can they be overcome? (2012)Publication bias: what is it? How do we measure it? How do we avoid it? (2013)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review (2013)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (2011)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Publication Decisions and Their Possible Effects on Inferences Drawn from Tests of Significance--Or Vice Versa (1959)Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system (1977)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis (2001)Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Publication bias in animal research: a systematic review protocol (2013)Meta-Analyses of Animal Studies: An Introduction of a Valuable Instrument to Further Improve Healthcare (2014)The Effects of Political Incivility on Political Trust and Political Participation: A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Research (2021)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Meta-analyses involving cross-over trials: methodological issues (2002)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2013)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses (2000)Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry (2008)Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors' (2008)Investigation of publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a meta-epidemiological study (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2013SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials7,356 cited
  • 1996The cochrane database of systematic reviews5,989 cited
  • 2010The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews1,133 cited
  • 2010Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases1,039 cited
  • 1997Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects820 cited
  • 2005Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors612 cited
  • 2004Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors412 cited
  • 2004Clinical Trial Registration: A Statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors276 cited
  • 2011Completeness and Changes in Registered Data and Reporting Bias of Randomized Controlled Trials in ICMJE Journals after Trial Registration Policy115 cited
  • 2012Meta-analyses: what they can and cannot do102 cited
  • 2010Finding studies on reboxetine: a tale of hide and seek36 cited
  • 2012(Meta)analyze this: Systematic reviews might lose credibility34 cited
  • 2010Unpublished data can be of value in systematic reviews of adverse effects: methodological overview33 cited
  • 2004

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Value of updating a systematic review in surgery using individual patient data
28 cited
  • 2012Selective Outcome Reporting as a Source of Bias in Reviews of Comparative Effectiveness25 cited
  • 2007Clinical trial registration: looking back and moving ahead14 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.