SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Do we know the effectiveness of behavioural interventions?
9 references·1 citing·41 second hop
Do we know the effectiveness of behavioural interventions? (1998)Do we know the effectiveness of behaviour…The Scientific Wealth of Nations (1997)The Scientific Wealth of Nati…The Dynamic Topology Of Sexually Transmitted Disease Epidemics: Implications For Prevention Strategies (1996)The Dynamic Topology Of Sexua…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. D…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical Evidence of BiasPublication Bias: The Problem That Won't Go Away (1993)Publication Bias: The Problem…The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)The Existence of Publication …A Cohort Study of Summary Reports of Controlled Trials (1990)A Cohort Study of Summary Rep…Publication Bias: A Problem in Interpreting Medical Data (1988)Publication Bias: A Problem i…Publication Decisions and their Possible Effects on Inferences Drawn from Tests of Significance—or Vice Versa (1959)Publication Decisions and the…Breaking the silence: setting realistic priorities for AIDS control in less-developed countries (2000)Breaking the silence: setting…Condom promotion, sexually transmitted diseases treatment, and declining incidence of HIV-1 infection in female Zairian sex workers (1994)Confronting AIDS : public priorities in a global epidemic (1997)World Development Indicators 2000 (2000)Defining and refining international donor support for combating the AIDS pandemic (2001)International response to the HIV/AIDS epidemic: planning for success. (2001)The Economics of HIV/AIDS in Low-Income Countries: The Case for Prevention (2006)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results (1992)An Exchange: Part I : Does Money Matter? A Meta-Analysis of Studies of the Effects of Differential School Inputs on Student Outcomes (1994)… and the Cross-Section of Expected Returns (2015)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Testing and adjusting for publication bias (2001)Publication Bias in Editorial Decision Making (2002)Effectiveness of Treatment Approaches for Children and Adolescents with Reading Disabilities: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (2014)The diffusion of innovations (1983)Determinants of STD epidemics: implications for phase appropriate intervention strategies (2002)Role of core and bridging groups in the transmission dynamics of HIV and STIs in Cotonou, Benin, West Africa (2002)HIV and Other Sexually Transmitted Infections in a Cohort of Women Involved in High-Risk Sexual Behavior in Kampala, Uganda (2011)Diffusion of Innovations 1 (2019)A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial (1981)Confronting publication bias: A cohort design for meta‐analysis (1987)Underreporting Research Is Scientific Misconduct (1990)Problems and Limitations in Conducting Systematic Reviews (2001)Adjustment of meta-analyses on the basis of quality scores should be abandoned (2006)Adapting health promotion interventions to meet the needs of ethnic minority groups: mixed-methods evidence synthesis. (2012)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Beyond WEIRD: Towards a broad-based behavioral science (2010)The weirdest people in the world? (2010)WEIRD languages have misled us, too [Comment on Henrich et al.] (2010)Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis. (1975)A meta-analytic review of prolonged exposure for posttraumatic stress disorder (2010)An Agenda for Purely Confirmatory Research (2012)Publication bias in meta-analysis its causes and consequences (2000)A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta‐analysis (2001)How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
  • 1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
  • 1990The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence1,413 cited
  • 1959Publication Decisions and their Possible Effects on Inferences Drawn from Tests of Significance—or Vice Versa964 cited
  • 1988Publication Bias: A Problem in Interpreting Medical Data814 cited
  • 1997The Scientific Wealth of Nations596 cited
  • 1993Publication Bias: The Problem That Won't Go Away427 cited
  • 1996The Dynamic Topology Of Sexually Transmitted Disease Epidemics: Implications For Prevention Strategies327 cited
  • 1990A Cohort Study of Summary Reports of Controlled Trials202 cited

Cited by

  • 2000Breaking the silence: setting realistic priorities for AIDS control in less-developed countries147 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work