Gridlock: UNESCO, global conflict and failed ambitions

Lynn M. Meskell

88 citations0/0 files storedWorld Archaeology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation International Relations and Foreign Policy Cultural Identity and Heritage

Abstract

Deliberations over World Heritage designation increasingly provide a platform for new political alliances, international tensions and challenges to global cooperation. How has this situation arisen in UNESCO, an organization dedicated to fostering peace, tolerance and international co-operation? Since we now face an ever more interconnected world and our problems are more global they require solutions that traverse nation-states and require them to work effectively together. Yet any decision to act or protect, especially during conflict, inevitably leads to multi-polarity, fragmentation and impasse. Drawing on Hale and Held’s theory of gridlock that underscores the failures of multilateralism across the UN generally, I suggest that World Heritage provides a salient example. Since UNESCO relies on the consent and participation of sovereign nations, their decisions often mirror the very lowest level of ambition to prevail. Case studies are drawn from recent conflict over World Heritage sites in Mali, Syria and Crimea.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 88 citations exist upstream.

References

2010Walled States, Waning Sovereignty 2013UNESCO’s World Heritage Convention at 40 2014Multilateralism and UNESCO World Heritage: decision-making, States Parties and political processes 2014States of Conservation: Protection, Politics, and Pacting within UNESCO’s World Heritage Committee 2012The rush to inscribe: Reflections on the 35th Session of the World Heritage Committee, UNESCO Paris, 2011 2010Creative Heritage: Palestinian Heritage NGOs and Defiant Arts of Government 2015Transacting UNESCO World Heritage: gifts and exchanges on a global stage 2010World Heritage and mosaic universalism

Cited by

2019UNESCO’s project to ‘Revive the Spirit of Mosul’: Iraqi and Syrian opinion on heritage reconstruction after the Islamic State 2019Culture and Order in World Politics 2018On Heritage Ontologies: Rethinking the Material Worlds of Heritage 2019The Islamic State’s destruction of Yezidi heritage: Responses, resilience and reconstruction after genocide 2016World Heritage and WikiLeaks

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.