Article1978

The comparative utility of three types of behavioral units for interaction analysis

78 citations0/0 files storedCommunication Monographs

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies Attachment and Relationship Dynamics Qualitative Research Methods and Applications

Abstract

This study considers types of units of interactive behavior by contrasting time units and two kinds of natural units, utterances and thought units. An empirical investigation into comparative reliabilities and data distributions obtained when employing time units, utterances, and thought units on the same set of transcripts is reported. Generally, both the thought and utterance units possess the greatest utility for interaction analysis research, although each generates a data distribution different from the other.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 78 citations exist upstream.

References

1969The Handbook of Social Psychology 1970Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities.1956Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority.1950Interaction Process Analysis: A Method for the Study of Small Groups.2016Research methods for the behavioral sciences 1971Personality and Interpersonal Behavior.1971Personality and Interpersonal Behavior.1950Unitizing and categorizing problems in coding qualitative data

Cited by

2017More and Less Effective Updating: The Role of Trajectory Management in Making Sense Again 2000Majority-Minority Influence: Identifying Argumentative Patterns and Predicting Argument-Outcome Links 1987Argument structures in decision‐making groups 1998Argument in group decision making: Explicating a process model and investigating the argument‐outcome link 2018When a Man Meets a Woman: Comparing the Use of Negativity of Male Candidates in Single- and Mixed-Gender Televised Debates

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.