Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The comparative utility of three types of behavioral units for interaction analysis

11 references·16 citing·32 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1969The Handbook of Social Psychology12,518 cited
1970Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities.4,564 cited
1956Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority.4,264 cited
1950Interaction Process Analysis: A Method for the Study of Small Groups.1,673 cited
2016Research methods for the behavioral sciences1,110 cited
1971Personality and Interpersonal Behavior.655 cited
1971Personality and Interpersonal Behavior.538 cited
1950Unitizing and categorizing problems in coding qualitative data440 cited
1952The structure of English338 cited
1963Handbook of Research on Teaching330 cited
1956Rules for Dividing Interviews Into Sentences123 cited

Cited by

2017More and Less Effective Updating: The Role of Trajectory Management in Making Sense Again118 cited
2000Majority-Minority Influence: Identifying Argumentative Patterns and Predicting Argument-Outcome Links72 cited
1987Argument structures in decision‐making groups59 cited
1998Argument in group decision making: Explicating a process model and investigating the argument‐outcome link

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

57 cited

2018When a Man Meets a Woman: Comparing the Use of Negativity of Male Candidates in Single- and Mixed-Gender Televised Debates54 cited

1991Argument in initial group decision‐making discussions: Refinement of a coding scheme and a descriptive quantitative analysis53 cited

1991Couples' argument sequences and their associations with relational characteristics52 cited

2017The effects of tone, focus, and incivility in election debates50 cited

1982An Analysis of Communication Patterns: A Method for Discriminating Leader and Subordinate Roles49 cited

1995Toward a theory of minimally rational argument: Analyses of episode‐specific effects of argument structures39 cited

1997Powerful/powerless language use in group interactions: Sex differences or similarities?38 cited

1997Sex differences and group argument: A theoretical framework and empirical investigation38 cited

1997Trait argumentativeness, verbal aggressiveness, and minimally rational argument: An observational analysis of friendship discussions34 cited

2002Politeness Strategies in the 1992 Vice Presidential and Presidential Debates30 cited

2012Expressing Emotions as Evidence in Osteoporosis Narratives: Effects on Message Processing and Intentions28 cited

2007Conversational Argumentation in Decision Making: Chinese and U.S. Participants in Face-to-Face and Instant-Messaging Interactions28 cited