SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
How Important Is Trade and Foreign Ownership in Closing the Technology Gap? Evidence from Estonia and Slovenia
16 references·1 citing·32 second hop
How Important Is Trade and Foreign Ownership in Closing the Technology Gap? Evidence from Estonia and Slovenia (2005)How Important Is Trade and Foreign Owners…World Investment Report (2017)World Investment ReportDoes Foreign Direct Investment Increase the Productivity of Domestic Firms? In Search of Spillovers Through Backward Linkages (2004)Does Foreign Direct Investmen…Does Foreign Direct Investment Increase the Productivity of Domestic Firms? In Search of Spillovers through Backward Linkages (2002)Does Foreign Direct Investmen…The effects of foreign direct investment on domestic firms (2001)The effects of foreign direct…Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (2001)Econometric Analysis of Cross…Foreign Investment and Productivity Growth in Czech Enterprises (2000)Foreign Investment and Produc…Technology transfer and spillovers: Does local participation with multinationals matter? (1999)Technology transfer and spill…Do Domestic Firms Benefit from Direct Foreign Investment? Evidence from Venezuela (1999)Do Domestic Firms Benefit fro…How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth? (1998)How does foreign direct inves…International R&D spillovers (1995)International R&D spilloversAre there positive spillovers from direct foreign investment? (1993)Are there positive spillovers…Technological Innovation and Multinational Corporations. (1990)Technological Innovation and …Resource and output trends in the United States since 1870 (1989)Resource and output trends in…Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R & D (1989)Innovation and Learning: The …Specification Tests in Econometrics (1978)Specification Tests in Econom…Multinational Firms, Competition, and Productivity in Host-Country Markets (1974)Multinational Firms, Competit…DIFFERENT WAYS, SAME OUTCOME? LIBERAL COMMUNICATION POLICY AND DEVELOPMENT OF PUBLIC BROADCASTING; pp. 74–101 (2011)DIFFERENT WAYS, SAME OUTCOME?…Successful Industrial Products from Customer Ideas (1978)Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation (1990)Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology (1996)Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (1997)Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension (2002)Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics (1983)Trade Liberalization, Intermediate Inputs, and Productivity: Evidence from Indonesia (2007)The Effects of Entry on Incumbent Innovation and Productivity (2009)On the Pooling of Time Series and Cross Section Data (1978)Estimating Standard Errors in Finance Panel Data Sets: Comparing Approaches (2008)Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation (1982)Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations (1991)Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models (1995)Corporate social responsibility and access to finance (2013)The China Syndrome: Local Labor Market Effects of Import Competition in the United States (2013)Co-Integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing (1987)Endogenous Technological Change (1990)The New Growth Evidence (1999)The determinants of national innovative capacity (2002)Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties (2002)Endogenous Technological Change (1989)Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization (2006)An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. (1983)Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (1991)The Competitive Advantage of Nations (1991)International expansion of emerging market enterprises: A springboard perspective (2007)Is Learning by Exporting Important? Micro-Dynamic Evidence from Colombia, Mexico, and Morocco (1998)Foreign direct investment as a catalyst for industrial development (1999)Much Ado about Nothing? Do Domestic Firms Really Benefit from Foreign Direct Investment? (2004)FDI and economic growth: the role of local financial markets (2003)International Technology Diffusion (2004)Welfare gains from Foreign Direct Investment through technology transfer to local suppliers (2007)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2001Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data27,575 cited
  • 1978Specification Tests in Econometrics18,788 cited
  • 1989Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R & D7,527 cited
  • 1998How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth?6,059 cited
  • 1995International R&D spillovers4,115 cited
  • 1999Do Domestic Firms Benefit from Direct Foreign Investment? Evidence from Venezuela3,625 cited
  • 2017World Investment Report3,263 cited
  • 2004Does Foreign Direct Investment Increase the Productivity of Domestic Firms? In Search of Spillovers Through Backward Linkages2,944 cited
  • 2002Does Foreign Direct Investment Increase the Productivity of Domestic Firms? In Search of Spillovers through Backward Linkages2,054 cited
  • 1993Are there positive spillovers from direct foreign investment?1,493 cited
  • 1974Multinational Firms, Competition, and Productivity in Host-Country Markets1,379 cited
  • 1990Technological Innovation and Multinational Corporations.1,334 cited
  • 1989Resource and output trends in the United States since 18701,247 cited
  • 2000Foreign Investment and Productivity Growth in Czech Enterprises879 cited
  • 1999Technology transfer and spillovers: Does local participation with multinationals matter?

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

863 cited
  • 2001The effects of foreign direct investment on domestic firms751 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2011DIFFERENT WAYS, SAME OUTCOME? LIBERAL COMMUNICATION POLICY AND DEVELOPMENT OF PUBLIC BROADCASTING; pp. 74–10111 cited