SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
‘How many plastic surgeons does it take to write a research article?’ – Authorship proliferation in and internationalisation of the plastic surgery literature
8 references·10 citing·37 second hop
‘How many plastic surgeons does it take to write a research article?’ – Authorship proliferation in and internationalisation of the plastic surgery literature (2007)‘How many plastic surgeons does it take t…Authorship ignorance: views of researchers in French clinical settings (2005)Authorship ignorance: views o…Changes in authorship patterns in prestigious US medical journals (2004)Changes in authorship pattern…Unethical practices in authorship of scientific papers (2003)Unethical practices in author…Internationalization of General Surgical Journals (2001)Internationalization of Gener…How Many Neurosurgeons Does It Take to Write a Research Article? Authorship Proliferation in Neurosurgical Research (2000)How Many Neurosurgeons Does I…When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable (1997)When authorship fails. A prop…Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (1997)Uniform requirements for manu…The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty (1997)The vexed question of authors…Publishing trends in Journal of Paediatric Surgery, Pediatric Surgery International and European Journal of Pediatric Surgery over the past three decades (2019)Publishing trends in Journal …Conversion of Plastic Surgery meeting abstract presentations to full manuscripts: a brazilian perspective (2017)Conversion of Plastic Surgery…Discrepancies Between Plastic Surgery Meeting Abstracts and Subsequent Full-Length Manuscript Publications (2016)Discrepancies Between Plastic…Authorship Trends in 30 Years of the Journal of Arthroplasty (2016)Authorship Trends in 30 Years…Writers Blocked: On the Wrongs of Research Co-authorship and Some Possible Strategies for Improvement (2014)Writers Blocked: On the Wrong…Authorship Conflicts (2013)Authorship ConflictsMultiple Authorship and Article Type in Journals of Urology across the Atlantic: Trends over the Past Six Decades (2012)Multiple Authorship and Artic…Determining authorship in multicenter trials: a systematic review (2011)Determining authorship in mul…Authorship characteristics in prosthodontic literature: proliferation and internationalization. A review and analysis following a 10-year observation (2010)Authorship characteristics in…“Backstage solidarity” in Spanish‐ and English‐written medical research papers: Publication context and the acknowledgment paratext (2008)“Backstage solidarity” in Spa…Authorship Criteria and Disclosure of Contributions (2004)Prevalence and Factors of Intensive Care Unit Conflicts: The Conflicus Study (2009)Equal contributions and credit: an emerging trend in the characterization of authorship in major spine journals during a 10-year period (2015)Ten strategies for avoiding and overcoming authorship conflicts in academic publishing (2021)Research integrity in randomized clinical trials: A scoping umbrella review (2023)The Contributions of Authors to Multiauthored Biomedical Research Papers (1994)Prevalence of Honorary and Ghost Authorship in Cochrane Reviews (2002)Scientific Collaboration Results in Higher Citation Rates of Published Articles (2006)Little Science, Big Science (1963)Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? (2001)Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey (2011)When Authorship Fails (1997)Prevalence of Articles With Honorary Authors and Ghost Authors in Peer-Reviewed Medical Journals (1998)The White Bull effect: abusive coauthorship and publication parasitism (2005)Authorship and Responsibility in Health Sciences Research: A Review of Procedures for Fairly Allocating Authorship in Multi-Author Studies (2011)The top-cited research works in the Science Citation Index Expanded (2012)Guidelines on Authorship of Medical Papers (1986)Inflated numbers of authors over time have not been just due to increasing research complexity (2008)Authorship Inflation in Medical Publications (2015)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Measuring Co-Authorship and Networking-Adjusted Scientific Impact (2008)Changes in Pronoun Use in American Books and the Rise of Individualism, 1960-2008 (2012)Part II: Should the h-Index Be Modified? An Analysis of the m-Quotient, Contemporary h-Index, Authorship Value, and Impact Factor (2013)Declining American Representation in Leading Clinical-Research Journals (1990)Publications of plastic surgery research 1972 through 2004: a longitudinal trend analysis of three international journals (2006)The journals of importance to UK clinicians: a questionnaire survey of surgeons (2006)Evidence-based burn care—An assessment of the methodological quality of research published in burn care journals from 1982 to 2008 (2010)Authorship! Authorship! Guests, ghosts, grafters, and the two-sided coin (1994)An international survey indicated that unpublished systematic reviews exist (2009)Authorship: attitudes and practice among Norwegian researchers (2014)Researchers’ Perceptions of Ethical Authorship Distribution in Collaborative Research Teams (2019)Authorship grids: Practical tools to facilitate collaboration and ethical publication (2018)How to Handle Co-authorship When Not Everyone’s Research Contributions Make It into the Paper (2021)Reducing tensions and expediting manuscript submission via an authorship agreement for early-career researchers: A pilot study (2021)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1997When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable566 cited
  • 1997Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors358 cited
  • 1997The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty242 cited
  • 2003Unethical practices in authorship of scientific papers216 cited
  • 2004Changes in authorship patterns in prestigious US medical journals161 cited
  • 2005Authorship ignorance: views of researchers in French clinical settings83 cited
  • 2000How Many Neurosurgeons Does It Take to Write a Research Article? Authorship Proliferation in Neurosurgical Research82 cited
  • 2001Internationalization of General Surgical Journals36 cited

Cited by

  • 2011Determining authorship in multicenter trials: a systematic review34 cited
  • 2014Writers Blocked: On the Wrongs of Research Co-authorship and Some Possible Strategies for Improvement31 cited
  • 2016Authorship Trends in 30 Years of the Journal of Arthroplasty30 cited
  • 2010Authorship characteristics in prosthodontic literature: proliferation and internationalization. A review and analysis following a 10-year observation23 cited
  • 2008“Backstage solidarity” in Spanish‐ and English‐written medical research papers: Publication context and the acknowledgment paratext23 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2019
Publishing trends in Journal of Paediatric Surgery, Pediatric Surgery International and European Journal of Pediatric Surgery over the past three decades
20 cited
  • 2013Authorship Conflicts16 cited
  • 2012Multiple Authorship and Article Type in Journals of Urology across the Atlantic: Trends over the Past Six Decades13 cited
  • 2016Discrepancies Between Plastic Surgery Meeting Abstracts and Subsequent Full-Length Manuscript Publications11 cited
  • 2017Conversion of Plastic Surgery meeting abstract presentations to full manuscripts: a brazilian perspective9 cited