SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Editorial Peer Review in US Medical Journals
3 references·8 citing·46 second hop
Editorial Peer Review in US Medical Journals (1990)Editorial Peer Review in US Medical Journ…A Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine (1992)A Difficult Balance: Editoria…Little Science, Big Science...and Beyond (1986)Little Science, Big Science..…SCI journal citation reports : a bibliometric analysis of science journals in the ISI data base. 1981 annual (1982)SCI journal citation reports …Reviewing the review: a qualitative assessment of the peer review process in surgical journals (2018)Reviewing the review: a quali…Peer review and journal impact factor: the two pillars of contemporary medical publishing. (2010)Peer review and journal impac…The Peer-Review Process and Its Relationship With Environmental and Occupational Health (2008)The Peer-Review Process and I…Statistical reviewing policies in dermatology journals: Results of a questionnaire survey of editors (2004)Statistical reviewing policie…Accuracy in the Identification of Scholarly and Peer-Reviewed Journals and the Peer-Review Process Across Disciplines (2003)Accuracy in the Identificatio…Identifying peer-reviewed journals in clinical medicine. (1997)Identifying peer-reviewed jou…A comparison of authors publishing in two groups of U.S. medical journals. (1996)A comparison of authors publi…Clinical Research in Otolaryngology Journals (1991)Clinical Research in Otolaryn…The Evolution of Editorial Peer Review (1990)Journal Prestige, Publication Bias, and Other Characteristics Associated With Citation of Published Studies in Peer-Reviewed Journals (2002)The politics of publication (2003)US and Non-US Submissions (1998)Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)Subjective Performance and the Value of Blind Evaluation (2011)Submission letters for academic publication: Disciplinary differences and promotional language (2014)Blind Peer Review by Academic Journals (2016)The Effects of Double-Blind versus Single-Blind Reviewing: Experimental Evidence from The American Economic Review (2016)Clinical Research in General Medical Journals (1979)The Series of Consecutive Cases as a Device for Assessing Outcomes of Intervention (1984)Volume: Papers and Academic Promotion (1987)How to Systematically Review the Medical Literature (1996)Proliferation of authors on research reports in medicine (1996)Increased Female Authorship in Otolaryngology Over the Past Three Decades (2000)Peer review and publication. Presidential address before the 70th annual meeting of the American Society for Clinical Investigation, San Francisco, California, 30 April 1978. (1978)Medical Authorship: Traditions, Trends, and Tribulations (1990)The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)The fate of papers rejected by Australian Family Physician. (2006)Rebound Peer Review: A Viable Recourse for Aggrieved Authors? (2011)Bibliometric analysis of aerosol research in meteorology and atmospheric sciences (2012)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Mail and internet surveys : the tailored design method (2007)Evaluating the Surgery Literature (2009)Improving peer review of systematic reviews by involving librarians and information specialists: protocol for a randomized controlled trial (2021)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)The More Publication, the Higher Impact Factor: Citation Analysis of Top Nine Gastroenterology and Hepatology Journals (2012)Trends of the main bibliometric indicators of Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia (2010–2019) (2021)Effects of open access publishing on article metrics in Neuropsychopharmacology (2024)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Journal editors’ perspectives on the communication practices in biomedical journals: a qualitative study (2020)Towards a new paradigm for ‘journal quality’ criteria: a scoping review (2022)The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation (1991)A COMPARISON OF THE INFORMATION SEEKING PATTERNS OF RESEARCHERS IN THE PHYSICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCES (1993)Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience: Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone? (2000)The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason (1975)What is research collaboration? (1997)Scholarly communication and bibliometrics (2002)Causal models of publishing productivity in psychology. (1989)Research contribution, authorship and team cooperativeness (1993)Interorganizational network and innovation: a bibliometric study and proposed research agenda (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1986Little Science, Big Science...and Beyond855 cited
  • 1992A Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine212 cited
  • 1982SCI journal citation reports : a bibliometric analysis of science journals in the ISI data base. 1981 annual74 cited

Cited by

  • 1991Clinical Research in Otolaryngology Journals50 cited
  • 2003Accuracy in the Identification of Scholarly and Peer-Reviewed Journals and the Peer-Review Process Across Disciplines23 cited
  • 2018Reviewing the review: a qualitative assessment of the peer review process in surgical journals22 cited
  • 2010Peer review and journal impact factor: the two pillars of contemporary medical publishing.22 cited
  • 1996A comparison of authors publishing in two groups of U.S. medical journals.18 cited
  • 2004Statistical reviewing policies in dermatology journals: Results of a questionnaire survey of editors12 cited
  • 2008The Peer-Review Process and Its Relationship With Environmental and Occupational Health9 cited
  • 1997Identifying peer-reviewed journals in clinical medicine.9 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work