House of risk: a model for proactive supply chain risk management

I Nyoman Pujawan · Laudine Henriette Geraldin

392 citations0/0 files storedBusiness Process Management Journal

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management Quality and Supply Management Sustainable Supply Chain Management

Abstract

Purpose Increasingly, companies need to be vigilant with the risks that can harm the short‐term operations as well as the long‐term sustainability of their supply chain (SC). The purpose of this paper is to provide a framework to proactively manage SC risks. The framework will enable the company to select a set of risk agents to be treated and then to prioritize the proactive actions, in order to reduce the aggregate impacts of the risk events induced by those risk agents. Design/methodology/approach A framework called house of risk (HOR) is developed, which combines the basic ideas of two well‐known tools: the house of quality of the quality function deployment and the failure mode and effect analysis. The framework consists of two deployment stages. HOR1 is used to rank each risk agent based on their aggregate risk potentials. HOR2 is intended to prioritize the proactive actions that the company should pursue to maximize the cost‐effectiveness of the effort in dealing with the selected risk agents in HOR1. For illustrative purposes, a case study is presented. Findings The paper shows that the innovative model presented here is simple but useful to use. Research limitations/implications In the proposed framework, the correlations between risk events are ignored, something that future studies should consider including. Practical implications The framework is intended to be useful in practice. For the calculation processes, a simple spreadsheet application would be sufficient. However, most of the entries needed in the model are based on subjective judgment and hence cross‐functional involvement is needed. Originality/value The paper adds to the SC management literature, a novel practical approach of managing SC risks, in particular to select a set of proactive actions deemed cost‐effective.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 392 citations exist upstream.

References

2006Perspectives in supply chain risk management 2005Managing Disruption Risks in Supply Chains 2004Managing Risk To Avoid Supply-Chain Breakdown 2005A supply chain view of the resilient enterprise 2007The Severity of Supply Chain Disruptions: Design Characteristics and Mitigation Capabilities 2003Supply chain risk management: outlining an agenda for future research 2006Robust strategies for mitigating supply chain disruptions 2005An Empirical Analysis of the Effect of Supply Chain Disruptions on Long‐Run Stock Price Performance and Equity Risk of the Firm

Cited by

2019An advanced fuzzy Bayesian-based FMEA approach for assessing maritime supply chain risks 2015Analysis on supply chain risks in Indian apparel retail chains and proposal of risk prioritization model using Interpretive structural modeling 2017The ISO 31000 standard in supply chain risk management 2020Risk analysis of the agri-food supply chain: A multi-method approach 2015A multiple objective optimization based QFD approach for efficient resilient strategies to mitigate supply chain vulnerabilities: The case of garment industry of Bangladesh

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.