Son Preference and Fertility in Bangladesh

Mridul K. Chowdhury · Radheshyam Bairagi

86 citations0/0 files storedPopulation and Development Review

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences Family Dynamics and Relationships Reproductive Health and Contraception

Abstract

Researchers followed 22819 women from Matlab in rural Bangladesh with known sex composition of living children as of July 1982 for 3.5 years. They hypothesized that the effect of son preference on fertility is stronger in a population with adequate and available contraceptive service and relatively high contraceptive prevalence than a population with little to no contraceptive use or access. From July 1982-end of 1984 the contraceptive prevalence rate in the study area climbed from 35%-46%. It ranged from 17-23% in 1983-1985 (less than national average) in the comparison area. 58% of the women had additional children in the study area compared to 69% for the control area. The larger the family size the lower the percentage of women giving birth in both areas. This relationship was especially strong in families with = or + 3 children in the study area. Both areas had an association between sex composition of children and subsequent fertility. Further in both areas the percentage having additional children at each parity level was lower when the number of living sons was higher. this preference was strongest in the study area. For example the percentage difference between women having additional children at parity 2 and no son and those with 2 sons stood at 12% (79% vs. 67%). This difference stood at 4% in the comparison areas (79% vs. 75%). This supported their hypothesis. Overall at parities 70% indicating a strong effect of son preference on fertility in matlab. When women had at least 2 sons at parity 3 and 3 sons at parity 4 they generally did not have any additional children. If they had no daughters at these parities however they tended to have additional children. this indicated a preference for at least 1 living daughter.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 86 citations exist upstream.

References

1981Sex Bias in the Family Allocation of Food and Health Care in Rural Bangladesh 1980Sex Differentials in Mortality in Rural Bangladesh 1977Sons or Daughters: A Cross-Cultural Survey of Parental Preferences.1985Measuring the effect of sex preference on fertility: The case of Korea 1957Are Sex Mortality Differentials Biologically Caused?1989A formal theory for male-preferring stopping rules of childbearing: sex differences in birth order and in the number of siblings 1984The Value of Daughters and sons: A comparative Study of the Gender Preferences of Parents

Cited by

1999Family Demography, Social Theory, and Investment in Social Capital 2018Why are adult women missing? Son preference and maternal survival in India 2014Son Preference, Fertility and Family Structure: Evidence from Reproductive Behavior among Nigerian Women 2017Fertility, household size and poverty in Nepal 2000The Effect of Gender Preference on Contraceptive Use and Fertility in Rural Egypt 1994The Effect of Sex Preference on Contraceptive Use and Fertility in Rural South India

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.