Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Evaluating Meta-analyses in the General Surgical Literature

16 references·16 citing·36 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

1997Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test56,637 cited
1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
1998Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?3,560 cited
2000Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context2,307 cited
2001Reported Methodologic Quality and Discrepancies between Large and Small Randomized Trials in Meta-Analyses2,285 cited
1987Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials1,253 cited
1997Discrepancies between Meta-Analyses and Subsequent Large Randomized, Controlled Trials1,170 cited
1991Validation of an index of the quality of review articles788 cited
1998Methodology and Reports of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses534 cited
2002Correlation of Quality Measures With Estimates of Treatment Effect in Meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials473 cited
1996Assessing the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials:Current Issues and Future Directions436 cited
2002Statistical methods for assessing the influence of study characteristics on treatment effects in ‘meta‐epidemiological’ research

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

380 cited

1991Agreement among reviewers of review articles283 cited

1998Issues in Comparisons Between Meta-analyses and Large Trials253 cited

Cited by

2013Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews in the Orthopaedic Literature112 cited
2007The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: An independent appraisal*112 cited
2020PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) Extension for Chinese Herbal Medicines 2020 (PRISMA-CHM 2020)103 cited
2010Twenty Years of Meta-Analyses in Orthopaedic Surgery: Has Quality Kept Up with Quantity?84 cited
2006Meta-analysis in Surgery63 cited
2012Quality and transparency of overviews of systematic reviews62 cited
2014Methodology and reporting of meta-analyses in the neurosurgical literature60 cited
2017Endorsement of PRISMA statement and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in nursing journals: a cross-sectional study56 cited
2014Comparison of search strategies in systematic reviews of adverse effects to other systematic reviews55 cited
2009SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 8: Deciding how much confidence to place in a systematic review54 cited
2010A Systematic Evaluation of the Quality of Meta-analyses in Endodontics49 cited
2009Reporting and methodologic quality of Cochrane Neonatal review group systematic reviews46 cited
2015Reporting and methodological qualities of published surgical meta-analyses43 cited
2005Synthesizing medical evidence: systematic reviews and metaanalyses41 cited
2009The Quality of Meta-Analyses of Genetic Association Studies: A Review With Recommendations39 cited
2015Methodologic Quality of Systematic Reviews Published in the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Literature36 cited