SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Systematic reviews deserve more credit than they get
3 references·1 citing·22 second hop
Systematic reviews deserve more credit than they get (2013)Systematic reviews deserve more credit th…Empty Reviews: A Description and Consideration of Cochrane Systematic Reviews with No Included Studies (2012)Empty Reviews: A Description …(Meta)analyze this: Systematic reviews might lose credibility (2012)(Meta)analyze this: Systemati…Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Epidemiology and Reporting Ch…Systematic review approaches for climate change adaptation research (2015)Systematic review approaches …Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Movements shaping climate futures: A systematic mapping of protests against fossil fuel and low-carbon energy projects (2020)The ABC of systematic literature review: the basic methodological guidance for beginners (2020)Reactions towards organizational change: a systematic literature review (2022)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Apparently conclusive meta-analyses on interventions in critical care may be inconclusive—a meta-epidemiological study (2019)When do we need to do meta-analysis!!! (2023)Enhancing systematic literature review adapting ‘double diamond approach’ (2024)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Empty systematic reviews: hidden perils and lessons learned (2007)Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines (2010)Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series—paper 5: methods for integrating qualitative and implementation evidence within intervention effectiveness reviews (2017)How to do a systematic review (2017)Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis: A Step-by-Step Approach (2017)Using artificial intelligence methods for systematic review in health sciences: A systematic review (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews891 cited
  • 2012Empty Reviews: A Description and Consideration of Cochrane Systematic Reviews with No Included Studies234 cited
  • 2012(Meta)analyze this: Systematic reviews might lose credibility34 cited

Cited by

  • 2015Systematic review approaches for climate change adaptation research478 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work