SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

PubMed had a higher sensitivity than Ovid-MEDLINE in the search for systematic reviews · Study

ReviewPubMed had a higher sensitivity than Ovid-MEDLINE in the search for systematic reviews

Wanruchada Katchamart2010

Review2010

PubMed had a higher sensitivity than Ovid-MEDLINE in the search for systematic reviews

Wanruchada Katchamart · Amy Faulkner · Brian Michael Feldman · GEORGE A. TOMLINSON · Claire Bombardier

25 citations·0/0 files stored·Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews scientometrics and bibliometrics research Information Retrieval and Search Behavior

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 25 citations exist upstream.

References

1994Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews 2006How to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE: ten years on.2004Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of diagnosis from Medline: analytical survey 2005Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of treatment from Medline: analytical survey 2004Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound prognostic studies in MEDLINE: an analytic survey 2002Identifying Diagnostic Studies in MEDLINE: Reducing the Number Needed to Read 2006An alternative to the hand searching gold standard: validating methodological search filters using relative recall 2003BEYOND MEDLINE

Cited by

2017Is there an optimum number needed to retrieve to justify inclusion of a database in a systematic review search?2012Publications des thèses d’exercice soutenues à la faculté de médecine de Lille

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2017Assessing the performance of methodological search filters to improve the efficiency of evidence information retrieval: five literature reviews and a qualitative studyarticle · 6 shared references 2013Search strategies to identify diagnostic accuracy studies in MEDLINE and EMBASEreview · 5 shared references 2010Inclusion of methodological filters in searches for diagnostic test accuracy studies misses relevant studiesarticle · 5 shared references 2007Systematic reviews of test accuracy should search a range of databases to identify primary studiesreview · 5 shared references 2012Routine development of objectively derived search strategiesarticle · 5 shared references 2018Systematic review identifies six metrics and one method for assessing literature search effectiveness but no consensus on appropriate usereview · 5 shared references

Details

Year2010

Typereview

Published2010-10-08

VenueJournal of Clinical Epidemiology

ISSN-L0895-4356

Languageen

Citations25

Files0 public / 0

ShelfMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.06.004

openalex_workW2082561471

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.