Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

PubMed had a higher sensitivity than Ovid-MEDLINE in the search for systematic reviews

9 references·3 citing·39 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1994Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews2,256 cited
2006How to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE: ten years on.799 cited
2004Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of diagnosis from Medline: analytical survey547 cited
2005Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of treatment from Medline: analytical survey439 cited
2004Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound prognostic studies in MEDLINE: an analytic survey291 cited
2002Identifying Diagnostic Studies in MEDLINE: Reducing the Number Needed to Read173 cited
2006An alternative to the hand searching gold standard: validating methodological search filters using relative recall133 cited
2003BEYOND MEDLINE105 cited
2006Optimizing search strategies to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE53 cited

Cited by

2017Is there an optimum number needed to retrieve to justify inclusion of a database in a systematic review search?18 cited
2012Publications des thèses d’exercice soutenues à la faculté de médecine de Lille12 cited
2018Design and implementation of a tool for conversion of search strategies between PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE10 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work