SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Dashboard Shelves Open access My library Inbox Notes Write Learn Alerts

More

Ask your library Notifications Quick cite Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Almost all articles on cancer prognostic markers report statistically significant results · Study

ReviewAlmost all articles on cancer prognostic markers report statistically significant results

P. Kyzas2007

Review2007

Almost all articles on cancer prognostic markers report statistically significant results

P. Kyzas · Despina Denaxa-Kyza · John P. A. Ioannidis

231 citations·0/0 files stored·European Journal of Cancer

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews scientometrics and bibliometrics research Statistical Methods in Epidemiology

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 231 citations exist upstream.

References

2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False 1991Publication bias in clinical research 2005Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK)2004Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials 1998Meta-analysis Spurious precision? Meta-analysis of observational studies 1992Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results 2001Systematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variables 2007An exploratory test for an excess of significant findings

Cited by

2007Persistence of Contradicted Claims in the Literature 2013Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis for a Binary Outcome: One-Stage or Two-Stage?2012Publication of Tumor Marker Research Results: The Necessity for Complete and Transparent Reporting 2010Evaluating the Quality of Research into a Single Prognostic Biomarker: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 83 Studies of C-Reactive Protein in Stable Coronary Artery Disease 2009Prognostic markers in cancer: the evolution of evidence from single studies to meta-analysis, and beyond

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2007Methods for meta-analysis in genetic association studies: a review of their potential and pitfallsreview · 8 shared references 2020A historical review of publication biasreview · 7 shared references 2007Selection in Reported Epidemiological Risks: An Empirical Assessmentarticle · 7 shared references 2008Evaluation of the Potential Excess of Statistically Significant Findings in Published Genetic Association Studies: Application to Alzheimer's Diseasearticle · 6 shared references 2007Recent developments in meta‐analysisreview · 5 shared references 2011Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trialsarticle · 5 shared references

Details

Year2007

Typereview

Published2007-11-01

VenueEuropean Journal of Cancer

ISSN-L0959-8049

Languageen

Citations231

Files0 public / 0

ShelfMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.ejca.2007.08.030

openalex_workW2147603039

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2009Ten steps towards improving prognosis research

2014Improving the Transparency of Prognosis Research: The Role of Reporting, Data Sharing, Registration, and Protocols

2011STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology – Molecular Epidemiology (STROBE-ME): An Extension of the STROBE Statement