The Principle of Additivity and Its Relation to Clinical Decision Making

Evans Mandes · Theodore L. Gessner

3 citations0/0 files storedThe Journal of Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychological Testing and Assessment Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills Historical and Modern Theater Studies

Abstract

Clients (N = 178) with varying degrees of organic indicators were administered a psychological battery including the Memory for Designs Test (MFD; Graham & Kendall, 1960) to assess the extent to which joint presence of organic indicators affected the sensitivity of the MFD in identifying organicity. Joint presence failed to add to the discriminability of the MFD, although individual instruments such as the PIAT (Arithmetic) and WAIS-R (PIQ less than VIQ) clearly discriminated across the MFD.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 3 citations exist upstream.

References

2014Perceptual and Motor Skills 1982Handbook of clinical neuropsychology 1960MEMORY-FOR-DESIGNS TEST: REVISED GENERAL MANUAL 1973Screening organic brain impairment with the Memory-For-Designs test: Validation of comparison of different scoring systems and exposure times 1980Memory‐for‐designs test: Comparison of performance of young and old adults 1974Memory-for-Designs Performance of Brain-Damaged and Non-Damaged Psychiatric Patients 1974Usefulness of the Memory-for-Designs Test in Assessing Mild Organic Complications in Psychiatric Patients

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.