Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Cochrane Airways Group reviews were prioritized for updating using a pragmatic approach

4 references·3 citing·31 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2010Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?1,185 cited
2010A checklist for health research priority setting: nine common themes of good practice462 cited
2013A multicomponent decision tool for prioritising the updating of systematic reviews57 cited
2012Ensuring relevance for Cochrane reviews: evaluating processes and methods for prioritizing topics for Cochrane reviews53 cited

Cited by

2019The risk of conclusion change in systematic review updates can be estimated by learning from a database of published examples15 cited
2020Key stakeholders’ perspectives and experiences with defining, identifying and displaying gaps in health research: a qualitative study14 cited
2018Cochrane acute respiratory infections group's stakeholder engagement project identified systematic review priority areas10 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work