Article2006

“Getting on Board” with AMJ: Balancing Quality and Innovation in the Review Process

42 citations0/0 files storedAcademy of Management Journal

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

Publishing and Scholarly Communication Academic Writing and Publishing Psychology Research and Bibliometrics

Abstract

This article discusses the importance of the editorial review process and the importance of having a fair and effective means of evaluating submitted works. Editors of journals such as the “Academy of Management Journal” (AMJ) must also be careful that in upholding the scientific standards of reliability and validity they don't become so conservative that they sacrifice innovation, variety, and risk taking. The author also outlines the AMJ editorial board selection process that insures the preservation of innovation while maintaining quality.

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 42 citations exist upstream.

References

1990Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation 1987THE PEOPLE MAKE THE PLACE 1998The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings.1974The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations 2006From the Editors: What Grounded Theory is Not 2018The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 2004Qualitative Research and the Academy of Management Journal 2005Unbundling the Structure of Inertia: Resource Versus Routine Rigidity

Cited by

2014Relationally Reflexive Practice 2009Gender Diversity in Editorial Boards of Management Journals.2017Editorial governance and journal impact: a study of management and business journals 2010Counting footnotes: Citability in management studies 2008Successful Authors and Effective Reviewers 2015Heterogeneous research networks in Latin American schools of business management

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.