SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The notwithstanding mechanism and public discussion: Lessons from the ignored practice of section 33 of the Charter
2 references·11 citing·43 second hop
The notwithstanding mechanism and public discussion: Lessons from the ignored practice of section 33 of the Charter (2001)The notwithstanding mechanism and public …Policy Distortion and Democratic Debilitation: Comparative Illumination of the Countermajoritarian Difficulty (1995)Policy Distortion and Democra…The Political Impact of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (1987)The Political Impact of the C…“You Can't Always Get What You Want”: Regime Politics, the Supreme Court of Canada, and the Harper Government (2017)“You Can't Always Get What Yo…Separation of Powers and the Growth of Judicial Review in Established Democracies (or Why Has the Model of Legislative Supremacy Mostly Been Withdrawn From Sale?) (2014)Separation of Powers and the …Constitutional Amendment by Constitutional Desuetude (2014)Constitutional Amendment by C…The Myth of the Imposed Constitution (2013)The Myth of the Imposed Const…Dialogue or compliance? Measuring legislatures’ policy responses to court rulings on rights (2012)Dialogue or compliance? Measu…The Supreme Court of Canada, Charter Dialogue and Deference (2009)The Supreme Court of Canada, …O STF e o controle de constitucionalidade: deliberação, diálogo e razão pública (2009)O STF e o controle de constit…Terms of Entitlement: Is there a Distinctly Canadian “Rights Talk”? (2008)Terms of Entitlement: Is ther…El diálogo democrático entre las cortes y las instituciones representativas (2008)El diálogo democrático entre …A Dialogue About Principle and a Principled Dialogue: Justice Iacobucci's Substantive Approach to Dialogue (2007)A Dialogue About Principle an…Parliamentary Bills of Rights: An Alternative Model? (2006)Parliamentary Bills of Rights…Why Deliberative Democracy? (2004)Processo Decisório no Supremo Tribunal Federal: aprofundando o diagnóstico das onze ilhas (2014)Quando a corte se divide: coalizões majoritárias mínimas no Supremo Tribunal Federal (2017)Capacidades institucionais dos amici curiae no Supremo Tribunal Federal: acessibilidade, admissibilidade e influência (2019)Curso de direito constitucional positivo (2020)Curso de direito constitucional (2020)The Charter Dialogue between Courts and Legislatures (Or Perhaps the Charter of Rights Isn't Such a Bad Thing after All) (1997)The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism (2001)The Charter Dialogue Between Courts and Legislatures© (2017)Is There Such Thing as ‘Populist Constitutionalism’? The Case of Hungary (2018)Judicial Review in New Democracies (2003)Political Constitutionalism (2007)Proportionality Balancing and Global Constitutionalism (2008)The Dilemmas of Constitutional Courts and the Case for a New Design of Kelsenian Institutions (2020)Beyond Presidentialism and Parliamentarism (2021)The imperfect legitimacy of judicial umpires in European multilevel democracies (2023)The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics (1966)THE POLITICAL PURPOSES OF THE CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS (1983)"Constitutional Promises" and Repressive Reality: A Cross-National Time- Series Investigation of Why Political and Civil Liberties are Suppressed (1996)Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker (2000)Christian Conservatives Go to Court:Religion and Legal Mobilization in the united States and Canada (2004)Rights Talk: The Impoverishment of Political Discourse. (1992)The Rights Revolution (2000)Rights Talk: The Impoverishment of Political Discourse (2001)Disability Rights Activists in the Supreme Court of Canada: Legal Mobilization Theory and Accommodating Social Movements (2009)Fair and equitable assessment practices for all students (2013)Navigating the principle of open court in the digital age: The more things change, the more they stay the same (2019)The Core of the Case against Judicial Review (2006)Weak Courts, Strong Rights (2009)Bills of Rights in the Common Law (2015)Assisted dying, suspended declarations, and dialogue’s time (2019)Common Law Constitutional Interpretation (1996)Expressive Theories of Law: A General Restatement (2000)IX.—Essentially Contested Concepts (1956)Pivotal Politics (1998)The Endurance of National Constitutions (2009)The Nonmajoritarian Difficulty: Legislative Deference to the Judiciary (1993)Neoliberal Penality: A Brief Genealogy (2009)Foreign Affairs Legalism: A Critique (2010)Low Stakes and Constitutional Interpretation (2010)Universal Exceptionalism in International Law (2010)Direitos fundamentais, separação de poderes e deliberação (2008)Comparing Regulatory Oversight Bodies Across the Atlantic: The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs in the US and the Impact Assessment Board in the EU (2010)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1995Policy Distortion and Democratic Debilitation: Comparative Illumination of the Countermajoritarian Difficulty70 cited
  • 1987The Political Impact of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms43 cited

Cited by

  • 2006Parliamentary Bills of Rights: An Alternative Model?70 cited
  • 2014Constitutional Amendment by Constitutional Desuetude58 cited
  • 2009O STF e o controle de constitucionalidade: deliberação, diálogo e razão pública40 cited
  • 2014Separation of Powers and the Growth of Judicial Review in Established Democracies (or Why Has the Model of Legislative Supremacy Mostly Been Withdrawn From Sale?)33 cited
  • 2009The Supreme Court of Canada, Charter Dialogue and Deference24 cited
  • 2012Dialogue or compliance? Measuring legislatures’ policy responses to court rulings on rights23 cited
  • 2008Terms of Entitlement: Is there a Distinctly Canadian “Rights Talk”?22 cited
  • 2013The Myth of the Imposed Constitution13 cited
  • 2017“You Can't Always Get What You Want”: Regime Politics, the Supreme Court of Canada, and the Harper Government12 cited
  • 2007A Dialogue About Principle and a Principled Dialogue: Justice Iacobucci's Substantive Approach to Dialogue10 cited
  • 2008El diálogo democrático entre las cortes y las instituciones representativas9 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work