Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Is content analysis either practical or desirable for research evaluation?

11 references·1 citing·44 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1994The Devolution of OR/MS: Implications from a Statistical Content Analysis of Papers in Flagship Journals83 cited
1995Judging the quality of research in business schools: The UK as a case study56 cited
1996Journal evaluation methodologies: A balanced response52 cited
1995Research Strategies Used by OR/MS Workers as Shown by an Analysis of Papers in Flagship Journals46 cited
1996Judging the quality of research in business schools: A comment from accounting35 cited
1997Using Citation Analysis to Explore the Intellectual Base, Knowledge Dissemination, and Research Impact of Interfaces (1970–1992)30 cited
1997An observation on publication habits based on the analysis of MS/OR journals27 cited
1996Editorial: Which Universities Contribute to the Practice Literature? The First Interfaces Ranking18 cited
1997Editorial: Which Universities Contribute to the Practice Literature? The Second Interfaces Ranking14 cited
1999Critically evaluating an applications vs theory framework for research quality13 cited
2000Research Strategies Used by OR/MS Workers: Extension of the Analysis of U.S. Flagship Journals to the United Kingdom11 cited

Cited by

2004Research Program Peer Review: Purposes, Principles, Practices, Protocols6 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work