SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The evaluation of judges at wine competitions: the application of Eggshell plots
0 references·5 citing·23 second hop
The evaluation of judges at wine competitions: the application of Eggshell plots (1997)The evaluation of judges at wine competit…Experience goods and the role of experts : recommendation effects on wine purchasing decision (2023)Experience goods and the role…The 2016 Wines of Portugal Challenge: general implications of more than 8400 wine-score observations (2017)The 2016 Wines of Portugal Ch…Seeking the Veritas about the Vino: fine wine ratings as wine knowledge (2015)Seeking the Veritas about the…Tasters’ bias in wine guides’ quality evaluations (2013)Tasters’ bias in wine guides’…804 Tastes: Evidence on Preferences, Randomness, and Value from Double-Blind Wine Tastings (2012)804 Tastes: Evidence on Prefe…What Determines Wine Prices: Objective vs. Sensory Characteristics (2006)An Examination of Judge Reliability at a major U.S. Wine Competition (2008)Do More Expensive Wines Taste Better? Evidence from a Large Sample of Blind Tastings (2008)The Distribution of Ratings Assigned to Blind Replicates (2017)Rate the Raters: A Note on Wine Judge Consistency (2020)Information and Consumer Behavior (1970)When and Why Incentives (Don't) Work to Modify Behavior (2011)Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2015)Community and Expert Wine Ratings and Prices (2019)Ratings meet prices: The dynamic relationship of quality signals (2023)The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism (1970)The Use of Quality and Reputation Indicators by Consumers: The Case of Bordeaux Wine (1997)Assessing Italian wine quality and prices: de gustibus non disputandum est (2016)Strategic winery reputation management – exploring German wine guides (2016)Quality Expectations, Reputation and Price (2019)Social Choice and Individual Values. (1951)Social Choice and Individual Values (1952)The choice axiom after twenty years (1977)Do Female and Male Judges Assign the Same Ratings to the Same Wines? Large Sample Results (2018)A maximum entropy estimate of uncertainty about a wine rating (2022)Stochastic error and biases remain in blind wine ratings (2022)Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. (2003)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2013Tasters’ bias in wine guides’ quality evaluations20 cited
  • 2015Seeking the Veritas about the Vino: fine wine ratings as wine knowledge19 cited
  • 2012804 Tastes: Evidence on Preferences, Randomness, and Value from Double-Blind Wine Tastings15 cited
  • 2017The 2016 Wines of Portugal Challenge: general implications of more than 8400 wine-score observations9 cited
  • 2023Experience goods and the role of experts : recommendation effects on wine purchasing decision0 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work