A meta-analysis of interrater and internal consistency reliability of selection interviews.

James M. Conway · Robert A. Jako · Deborah F. Goodman

318 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Applied Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Reliability and Agreement in Measurement Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Employer Branding and e-HRM

Abstract

A meta-analysis of 111 interrater reliability coefficients and 49 coefficient alphas from selection interviews was conducted. Moderators of interrater reliability included study design, interviewer training, and 3 dimensions of interview structure ( standardization of questions, of response evaluation, and of combining multiple ratings). Interactions showed that standardizing questions had a stronger moderating effect on reliability when coefficients were from separate ( rather than panel) interviews, and multiple ratings were useful when combined mechanically (there was no evidence of usefulness when combined subjectively). Average correlations (derived from alphas) between ratings were moderated by standardization of questions and number of ratings made. Upper limits of validity were estimated to be.67 for highly structured interviews and.34 for unstructured interviews.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 318 citations exist upstream.

References

1979Review of Psychometric theory (2nd ed.).1993What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications.2015Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings 1979The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making.1993Personnel Selection in Organizations 1994The validity of employment interviews: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis.

Cited by

2002Influence tactics and work outcomes: a meta‐analysis 2009What you see may not be what you get: Relationships among self-presentation tactics and ratings of interview and job performance.2001Identification and meta-analytic assessment of psychological constructs measured in employment interviews.2002BEYOND EMPLOYMENT INTERVIEW VALIDITY: A COMPREHENSIVE NARRATIVE REVIEW OF RECENT RESEARCH AND TRENDS OVER TIME 2000Personnel Selection: Looking Toward the Future--Remembering the Past 2012What Drives Key Informant Accuracy?2009The employment interview: A review of current studies and directions for future research

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.