Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Mock Jurors Versus Mock Juries: The Role of Deliberations in Reactions to Inadmissible Testimony

16 references·16 citing·45 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

1983Review of personality and social psychology3,365 cited
1976Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook2,012 cited
1986Differential contributions of majority and minority influence.1,256 cited
1983Accountability and complexity of thought.1,002 cited
1964Two Models of the Criminal Process403 cited
1988Asymmetric influence in mock jury deliberation: Jurors' bias for leniency.230 cited
1979Law, Justice, and the Individual in Society: Psychological and Legal Issues223 cited
1987Psychology and the legal system192 cited
1979A critical review of the jury simulation paradigm: The case of defendant characteristics.174 cited
1978Reducing the effects of juror bias.158 cited
1973Effects of inadmissible Evidence on the Decisions of Simulated Jurors: A Moral Dilemma152 cited
1981Inadmissible evidence and juror verdicts.115 cited
1976Group-Induced Polarization in Simulated Juries112 cited
1977Effects of Inadmissible Evidence and Level of Judicial Admonishment to Disregard on the Judgments of Mock Jurors1106 cited
1979Use of the simulation method in the study of jury behavior: Some methodological considerations.76 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1992A Test of Voir Dire as a Remedy for the Prejudicial Effects of Pretrial Publicity174 cited

Cited by

1997Coerced confessions and the jury: An experimental test of the "harmless error" rule.263 cited
2007Scientific jury selection.71 cited
2001On the Many Impacts of Inadmissible Testimony: Selective Compliance, Need for Cognition, and the Overcorrection Bias70 cited
2011Jury decision making research: Are researchers focusing on the mouse and not the elephant in the room?69 cited
2000The effect of jury deliberations on jurors' propensity to disregard inadmissible evidence.65 cited
2010The promise of a cognitive perspective on jury deliberation62 cited
1997Judgmental Biases Produced by Instructions to Disregard: The (Paradoxical) Case of Emotional Information59 cited
1997Computer-animated displays and the jury: Facilitative and prejudicial effects.54 cited
2003The verdict on jury trials for juveniles: the effects of defendant's age on trial outcomes53 cited
2003Deliberating on dangerousness and death: jurors' ability to differentiate between expert actuarial and clinical predictions of dangerousness49 cited
1999The effects of injury severity on jury negligence decisions.47 cited
2011Positive and Negative Pretrial Publicity46 cited
2006Chaos in The Courtroom Reconsidered: Emotional Bias and Juror Nullification.45 cited
1999The effect of jury deliberations on jurors' reasoning skills.40 cited
2001The effects of defendant conduct on jury damage awards.39 cited
2000Juror comprehension and public policy: Perceived problems and proposed solutions.30 cited