SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

How to reduce unnecessary duplication: use PROSPERO · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleHow to reduce unnecessary duplication: use PROSPERO

David Moher2014

Article2014

How to reduce unnecessary duplication: use PROSPERO

David Moher · Alison Booth · Lesley A. Stewart

113 citations·0/0 files stored·BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Delphi Technique in Research Methodologies in Health Research and Practice

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 113 citations exist upstream.

References

2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.2013SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials 2010Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care 2012The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews 2010The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews 2007Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews

Cited by

2016How to prepare a systematic review of economic evaluations for informing evidence-based healthcare decisions: a five-step approach (part 1/3)2020A systematic review on mediators between adversity and psychosis: potential targets for treatment 2017Majority of systematic reviews published in high-impact journals neglected to register the protocols: a meta-epidemiological study 2020Protocol registration improves reporting quality of systematic reviews in dentistry

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2016Ítems de referencia para publicar Protocolos de Revisiones Sistemáticas y Metaanálisis: Declaración PRISMA-P 2015article · 8 shared references 2019Providing transparency in systematic review methods: The case for protocol registrationreview · 8 shared references 2015Discrepancies in Outcome Reporting Exist Between Protocols and Published Oral Health Cochrane Systematic Reviewsreview · 7 shared references 2012Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sensereview · 6 shared references 2013Many scenarios exist for selective inclusion and reporting of results in randomized trials and systematic reviewsreview · 6 shared references 2020Future of evidence ecosystem series: 1. Introduction Evidence synthesis ecosystem needs dramatic changearticle · 6 shared references

Details

Year2014

Typearticle

Published2014-03-14

VenueBJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

ISSN-L0306-5456

Languageen

Citations113

Files0 public / 0

ShelfMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Identifiers

doi10.1111/1471-0528.12657

openalex_workW2087544847

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2018Protect us from poor-quality medical research

2019More systematic reviews were registered in PROSPERO each year, but few records' status was up-to-date

2019Half of systematic reviews about pain registered in PROSPERO were not published and the majority had inaccurate status

2019Increasing value and reducing research waste in obstetrics: towards woman‐centered research