Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

How to reduce unnecessary duplication: use PROSPERO

15 references·16 citing·42 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
2013SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials6,239 cited
2010Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care3,245 cited
2012The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews1,430 cited
2010The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews1,133 cited
2007Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews891 cited
1997Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects820 cited
1997A guide to interpreting discordant systematic reviews.394 cited
2013Overlapping meta-analyses on the same topic: survey of published studies248 cited
2011Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials243 cited
2002Publishing Protocols of Systematic Reviews188 cited
2012Registration of systematic reviews: PROSPERO

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

172 cited

2010Bias Due to Changes in Specified Outcomes during the Systematic Review Process164 cited

Cited by

2016How to prepare a systematic review of economic evaluations for informing evidence-based healthcare decisions: a five-step approach (part 1/3)220 cited
2020A systematic review on mediators between adversity and psychosis: potential targets for treatment122 cited
2017Majority of systematic reviews published in high-impact journals neglected to register the protocols: a meta-epidemiological study69 cited
2020Protocol registration improves reporting quality of systematic reviews in dentistry60 cited
2018Protect us from poor-quality medical research59 cited
2019More systematic reviews were registered in PROSPERO each year, but few records' status was up-to-date53 cited
2019Half of systematic reviews about pain registered in PROSPERO were not published and the majority had inaccurate status35 cited
2019Increasing value and reducing research waste in obstetrics: towards woman‐centered research22 cited
2017Are orthodontic systematic reviews registered a priori in PROSPERO?21 cited
2021The mass production of systematic reviews about COVID‐19: An analysis of PROSPERO records20 cited
2022Extent and nature of duplication in PROSPERO using COVID-19-related registrations: a retrospective investigation and survey16 cited
2020Redundant meta-analyses are common in genetic epidemiology14 cited
2021Enhancing engineering education through the integration of Open Science principles: A strategic approach to systematic reviews13 cited
2019Has the Reporting Quality of Systematic Review Abstracts in Nursing Improved Since the Release of PRISMA for Abstracts? A Survey of High‐Profile Nursing Journals13 cited
2020When and how to replicate systematic reviews13 cited
2021Assessment of Duplicate Evidence in Systematic Reviews of Imaging Findings of Children With COVID-1913 cited