SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Ghostwriting: Research Misconduct, Plagiarism, or Fool's Gold?
0 references·8 citing·31 second hop
Ghostwriting: Research Misconduct, Plagiarism, or Fool's Gold? (2012)Ghostwriting: Research Misconduct, Plagia…Guest authorship as research misconduct: definitions and possible solutions (2021)Guest authorship as research …Scholars’ preferred solutions for research misconduct: results from a survey of faculty members at America’s top 100 research universities (2019)Scholars’ preferred solutions…Ghostwriting in biomedicine: a review of the published literature (2019)Ghostwriting in biomedicine: …The Ethical Implications of Plagiarism and Ghostwriting in an Open Society (2017)The Ethical Implications of P…Experiences, behaviors, and perceptions of registered nurses regarding research ethics and misconduct (2017)Experiences, behaviors, and p…Research Dissemination: Guiding the Novice Researcher on the Publication Path (2015)Research Dissemination: Guidi…Criticism of peer review and ways to improve it (2013)Criticism of peer review and …Challenging Medical Ghostwriting in US Courts (2012)Challenging Medical Ghostwrit…The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)A study of open access journals using article processing charges (2012)Mentorship and pursuit of academic medicine careers: a mixed methods study of residents from diverse backgrounds (2014)Awareness of Jordanian Researchers About Predatory Journals: A Need for Training (2024)Prevalence of Articles With Honorary Authors and Ghost Authors in Peer-Reviewed Medical Journals (1998)Committee on publication ethics (2010)Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey (2011)Alternative Policies for Collaborative Publishing in Natural Resource Journals (2016)Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors (2011)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)The Logic of Scientific Discovery. (1959)Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. (1964)Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. (1965)Reimagining Academic Writing in Academia 4.0 to De‑incentivise Plagiarism (2020)Dubious or decisive? Digging deeper into the unchartered path of academic ghostwriting (2021)Evaluation of Different Plagiarism Detection Methods: A Fuzzy MCDM Perspective (2022)UNIFORM REQUIREMENTS FOR MANUSCRIPTS SUBMITTED TO BIOMEDICAL JOURNALS (1988)Differences in medical students’ attitudes to academic misconduct and reported behaviour across the years—a questionnaire study (2003)Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity (2015)Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication (2018)Ten hot topics around scholarly publishing (2019)The afterlife of a ghost-written paper: How corporate authorship shaped two decades of glyphosate safety discourse (2025)Causes of Delinquency (1970)Internet, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (2008)Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed‐Mode Surveys (2014)Plagiarism in dentistry - a systematic review (2020)Crossing the Red Line? Empirical Evidence and Useful Recommendations on Questionable Research Practices among Business Scholars (2021)Productivity patterns, collaboration and scientific careers of authors with retracted publications in clinical medicine (2022)When Authorship Fails (1997)Gaming the Metrics? Bibliometric Anomalies and the Integrity Crisis in Global University Rankings (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2019Ghostwriting in biomedicine: a review of the published literature25 cited
  • 2019Scholars’ preferred solutions for research misconduct: results from a survey of faculty members at America’s top 100 research universities22 cited
  • 2021Guest authorship as research misconduct: definitions and possible solutions22 cited
  • 2017The Ethical Implications of Plagiarism and Ghostwriting in an Open Society20 cited
  • 2012Challenging Medical Ghostwriting in US Courts16 cited
  • 2017Experiences, behaviors, and perceptions of registered nurses regarding research ethics and misconduct12 cited
  • 2013Criticism of peer review and ways to improve it10 cited
  • 2015Research Dissemination: Guiding the Novice Researcher on the Publication Path9 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work