Environmentally sensitive disclosures and financial performance in a European setting

Voicu Dan Dragomir

85 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Accounting & Organizational Change

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting Environmental Sustainability in Business Accounting and Financial Management

Abstract

Purpose Is the natural environment a stakeholder of the firm? And is there a business case for achieving sustainability? The purpose of this paper is to trace a tripartite relationship, involving environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and financial performance of environmentally sensitive activities of companies in a European setting. Design/methodology/approach A sample of 60 of the largest European Union industrial business groups, extracted from the FTSEuroFirst 300, and an environmental disclosure index inspired by the Global Reporting Initiative Guidelines, form the basis for the content analysis of the most recent sustainability reports published before the end of 2008. Findings A significant association is found between contemporaneous environmental performance and disclosure, in that bigger polluters tend to disclose more on their activities, but only to a moderate statistical effect. However, no association is found between environmental performance and financial performance, as well as between environmental disclosure and contemporaneous firm performance. Practical implications This result suggests that even though big polluters tend to report more, the transparency level of their activities may not be sufficient for a viable assessment of sustainability. For such “environmentally challenged” companies, their reputation‐building strategy is mainly focused on preserving or repairing legitimacy. Originality/value The paper considers two complementary aspects: first, that the relationship between sustainability commitment and financial performance may be so weak that it is barely detectable; and second, that cross‐sectional studies may fail in capturing a relationship that is normally shaped over longer periods of time.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 85 citations exist upstream.

References

1976Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure 2007G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences 1984Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology.2010Strategic management a stakeholder approach 1995Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches 2017The Content Analysis Guidebook 1995The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications 1999Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business

Cited by

2017The Impact of Corporate Governance Attributes on Environmental Disclosures: Evidence from India 2019Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and Performance: A Meta-Analytic Approach 2019The Relationship between Corporate Sustainability Disclosure and Firm Financial Performance in Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) Listed Mining Companies 2020CSR reporting: a review of research and agenda for future research 2020Explaining the complexity relationship of CSR and financial performance using neo-institutional theory

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.