SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Explaining Litigant Success in the High Court of Australia
16 references·0 citing·39 second hop
Explaining Litigant Success in the High Court of Australia (2012)Explaining Litigant Success in the High C…Decision‐making Process (2009)Decision‐making ProcessThe Oxford Companion to the High Court of Australia (2001)The Oxford Companion to the H…Explaining Executive Success in the U. S. Supreme Court (1998)Explaining Executive Success …The Life of the Law: Judicial Politics and Legal Change (1997)The Life of the Law: Judicial…Repeat Players in the Supreme Court: The Role of Experienced Lawyers in Litigation Success (1995)Repeat Players in the Supreme…Resource Inequalities and Litigation Outcomes in the Philippine Supreme Court (1994)Resource Inequalities and Lit…Political research quarterly (1993)Political research quarterlyParty Capability Theory and Appellate Success in the Supreme Court of Canada, 1949–1992 (1993)Party Capability Theory and A…Who Wins on Appeal? Upperdogs and Underdogs in the United States Courts of Appeals (1992)Who Wins on Appeal? Upperdogs…Ideology, Status, and The Differential Success of Direct Parties Before the Supreme Court (1992)Ideology, Status, and The Dif…Party Capability Theory as an Explanation for Intervention Behavior in the English Court of Appeal (1991)Party Capability Theory as an…Politics of the High Court: A Study of the Judicial Branch of Government in Australia (1988)Politics of the High Court: A…Do The “Haves” Come Out Ahead? Winning and Losing in State Supreme Courts, 1870–1970 (1987)Do The “Haves” Come Out Ahead…Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change (1974)Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahea…The Political System: An Inquiry into the State of Political Science (1954)The Political System: An Inqu…The Political System: An Inquiry into the State of Political Science, by David Easton (1953)The Political System: An Inqu…The Selection of Disputes for Litigation (1984)Legal Mobilization as a Social Movement Tactic: The Struggle for Equal Employment Opportunity (1991)The Legal Environments of Organizations (1997)Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods (1969)Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control (1977)Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control (1977)Integrated Models of Judicial Dissent (1993)Do the “Haves” Come Out Ahead over Time? Applying Galanter's Framework to Decisions of the U.S. Courts of Appeals, 1925-1988 (1999)Constitutional Review and the Selective Promotion of Case Results (2005)Organized Interests and Agenda Setting in the U.S. Supreme Court (1988)Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices (1989)The Influence of Oral Arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court (2006)Three's a Crowd: Third Parties and WTO Dispute Settlement (2006)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (1990)Explaining the Overruling of U.S. Supreme Court Precedent (2001)Lawyers, Justices, and Issue Salience: When and How Do Legal Arguments Affect the U.S. Supreme Court? (2007)The Supreme Court and Opinion Content (2007)Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (2019)Personal Attribute Models of the Voting Behavior of U.S. Supreme Court Justices: Liberalism in Civil Liberties and Economics Decisions, 1946–1978 (1981)Amicus Curiae and the Role of Information at the Supreme Court (1997)The Interplay of Preferences, Case Facts, Context, and Rules in the Politics of Judicial Choice (1997)A theory of justice original editionThe Logic of Collective Action (1965)Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. (1970)The Social Control of Impersonal Trust (1987)Legal Ambiguity and Symbolic Structures: Organizational Mediation of Civil Rights Law (1992)The New Comparative Economics (2003)Reconceiving Environmental Justice: Global Movements And Political Theories (2004)Necessary Condition Analysis (NCA) (2015)Embracing Causal Complexity (2016)Winners, Losers, and Attitudes about Government in Contemporary Democracies (2001)An Ecology Metaphor for Educational Policy Analysis: A Call to Complexity (2008)Belonging in an age of exclusion (2019)Future governance of innovation policy in Europe — three scenarios (2001)ALIGNING ONTOLOGY AND METHODOLOGY IN COMPARATIVE POLITICS (2003)The Distribution of Top Incomes in Australia* (2007)Parliamentary Sovereignty: Contemporary Debates (2010)The Politico-Legal Dynamics of Judicial Review (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1974Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change2,807 cited
  • 1993Political research quarterly1,578 cited
  • 1954The Political System: An Inquiry into the State of Political Science750 cited
  • 1953The Political System: An Inquiry into the State of Political Science, by David Easton464 cited
  • 1992Who Wins on Appeal? Upperdogs and Underdogs in the United States Courts of Appeals243 cited
  • 1995Repeat Players in the Supreme Court: The Role of Experienced Lawyers in Litigation Success223 cited
  • 1987Do The “Haves” Come Out Ahead? Winning and Losing in State Supreme Courts, 1870–1970220 cited
  • 1992Ideology, Status, and The Differential Success of Direct Parties Before the Supreme Court199 cited
  • 2001The Oxford Companion to the High Court of Australia144 cited
  • 1997The Life of the Law: Judicial Politics and Legal Change120 cited
  • 1988Politics of the High Court: A Study of the Judicial Branch of Government in Australia102 cited
  • 1994Resource Inequalities and Litigation Outcomes in the Philippine Supreme Court95 cited
  • 1993Party Capability Theory and Appellate Success in the Supreme Court of Canada, 1949–199290 cited
  • 2009Decision‐making Process88 cited
  • 1998

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Explaining Executive Success in the U. S. Supreme Court
82 cited
  • 1991Party Capability Theory as an Explanation for Intervention Behavior in the English Court of Appeal77 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.