SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Review Process in Economics: Is It Too Fast?
16 references·1 citing·42 second hop
The Review Process in Economics: Is It Too Fast? (2005)The Review Process in Economics: Is It To…The Effects of Double-Blind versus Single-Blind Reviewing: Experimental Evidence from The American Economic Review (2016)The Effects of Double-Blind v…The Academic Review Process: How Can We Make it More Efficient? (2006)The Academic Review Process: …Rejections and the importance of first response times (2004)Rejections and the importance…Evolving Standards for Academic Publishing: A q‐r Theory (2002)Evolving Standards for Academ…Reputational Capital and Academic Pay (2001)Reputational Capital and Acad…The Slowdown of the Economics Publishing Process (2000)The Slowdown of the Economics…Why referees are not paid (enough) (1998)Why referees are not paid (en…TOOLS OR TOYS? THE IMPACT OF HIGH TECHNOLOGY ON SCHOLARLY PRODUCTIVITY (1998)TOOLS OR TOYS? THE IMPACT OF …Rejected : leading economists ponder the publication process (1995)Rejected : leading economists…Favoritism versus Search for Good Papers: Empirical Evidence Regarding the Behavior of Journal Editors (1994)Favoritism versus Search for …Facts and Myths about Refereeing (1994)Facts and Myths about Referee…An analysis of publication lags in econometrics (1993)An analysis of publication la…Is There Value-Added from the Review Process in Economics?: Preliminary Evidence from Authors (1990)Is There Value-Added from the…On the mechanics of economic development (1988)On the mechanics of economic …Estimates of the Returns to Quality and Coauthorship in Economic Academia (1988)Estimates of the Returns to Q…The Optimal Order for Submitting Manuscripts (1980)The Optimal Order for Submitt…A Model of the Academic Review Process with Informed Authors (2015)A Model of the Academic Revie…The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)Does the “New Economy” Measure up to the Great Inventions of the Past? (2000)Does the “New Economy” Measure Up to the Great Inventions of the Past? (2003)Editorial Favoritism in Economics? (2003)Are elite universities losing their competitive edge? (2009)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Aging and Productivity Among Economists (1998)Assessing expert interdisciplinary work at the frontier: an empirical exploration (2006)Do directors perform for pay? (2008)Assessing the Relative Impacts of Economics Journals (1983)What is a Citation Worth? (1986)TRENDS IN RANKINGS OF ECONOMICS DEPARTMENTS IN THE U.S.: AN UPDATE (1996)The Social Science Citation Index: A Black Box—with an Ideological Bias? (2004)League Tables as Policy Instruments (2007)The Benefits of Being Economics Professor A (rather than Z) (2008)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)Scholarship, Citations and Salaries: Economic Rewards in Economics (1982)Not by Productivity Alone: How Visibility and Specialization Contribute to Academic Earnings (2007)Does Co‐authorship Lead to Higher Academic Productivity? (2014)The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing (1962)Human Capital (1983)Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth (1986)Endogenous Technological Change (1989)Increasing Returns and Economic Geography (1990)A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth (1992)Job Market Signaling (1973)The Economics of Science (2010)A Framework for Understanding and Researching Audit Quality (2011)Chapter 48 Race and gender in the labor market (1999)Orchestrating Impartiality: The Impact of “Blind” Auditions on Female Musicians (2000)Women in Academic Science (2014)What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (2008)The Superiority of Economists (2015)Publishing and Promotion in Economics: The Tyranny of the Top Five (2020)Optimal Pricing Mechanisms with Unknown Demand (2003)An Examination of the Reliability of Prestigious Scholarly Journals: Evidence and Implications for Decision‐Makers (2007)Does incentive provision increase the quality of peer review? An experimental study (2012)Economics : an emerging small world? (2004)How Much Better Are the Most-Prestigious Journals? The Statistics of Academic Publication (2005)The influence of management journals in the 1980s and 1990s (2005)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1988On the mechanics of economic development23,910 cited
  • 2000The Slowdown of the Economics Publishing Process514 cited
  • 2016The Effects of Double-Blind versus Single-Blind Reviewing: Experimental Evidence from The American Economic Review425 cited
  • 1994Favoritism versus Search for Good Papers: Empirical Evidence Regarding the Behavior of Journal Editors305 cited
  • 2002Evolving Standards for Academic Publishing: A q‐r Theory252 cited
  • 1988Estimates of the Returns to Quality and Coauthorship in Economic Academia249 cited
  • 1994Facts and Myths about Refereeing147 cited
  • 1990Is There Value-Added from the Review Process in Economics?: Preliminary Evidence from Authors127 cited
  • 2001Reputational Capital and Academic Pay85 cited
  • 1998TOOLS OR TOYS? THE IMPACT OF HIGH TECHNOLOGY ON SCHOLARLY PRODUCTIVITY82 cited
  • 1998Why referees are not paid (enough)69 cited
  • 1993An analysis of publication lags in econometrics49 cited
  • 1995Rejected : leading economists ponder the publication process49 cited
  • 2004Rejections and the importance of first response times48 cited
  • 1980The Optimal Order for Submitting Manuscripts44 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2006The Academic Review Process: How Can We Make it More Efficient?35 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2015A Model of the Academic Review Process with Informed Authors11 cited