SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Performing and evaluating meta-analyses
9 references·0 citing·34 second hop
Performing and evaluating meta-analyses (2014)Performing and evaluating meta-analysesThe importance of PROSPERO to the National Institute for Health Research (2012)The importance of PROSPERO to…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)Evaluating non-randomised int…Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Meta-analysis of Observationa…Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Assessing the quality of repo…Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)Primary, Secondary, and Meta-…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Avoidable Waste in the Production and Reporting of Research Evidence (2009)Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense (2012)How to reduce unnecessary duplication: use PROSPERO (2014)Where to prospectively register a systematic review (2022)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Book Reviews: Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis Larry V. Hedges and Ingram Olkin New York: Academic Press, 1985. xxii + 369 pp (1988)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses (2010)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (1963)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)Review of Educational Research. (1924)The study of teaching (1974)Response Effects in Surveys: A Review and Synthesis. (1976)Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence‐Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review (2003)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines (2019)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement84,364 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement65,829 cited
  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.48,853 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,084 cited
  • 2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting20,612 cited
  • 1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
  • 1976Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research5,330 cited
  • 2003Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies2,905 cited
  • 2012The importance of PROSPERO to the National Institute for Health Research82 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work