Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials in General Endocrinology Literature

16 references·16 citing·30 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
2001The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration3,828 cited
1998Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?3,560 cited
1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
2001Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials3,309 cited
1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
1999The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis1,981 cited
2001The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials1,426 cited
2001Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials1,026 cited
1994The scandal of poor medical research897 cited
2006Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review873 cited
2007Scales to Assess the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

827 cited

1996The CONSORT Statement736 cited

1996Completeness of reporting of trials published in languages other than English: implications for conduct and reporting of systematic reviews538 cited

Cited by

2014Oncology trial abstracts showed suboptimal improvement in reporting: a comparative before-and-after evaluation using CONSORT for Abstract guidelines76 cited
2019The reporting of progression criteria in protocols of pilot trials designed to assess the feasibility of main trials is insufficient: a meta-epidemiological study57 cited
2011Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials Reporting in the Treatment of Sarcomas50 cited
2010Randomized Controlled Trials of Acupuncture (1997–2007): An Assessment of Reporting Quality with a CONSORT‐ and STRICTA‐Based Instrument46 cited
2011Quality of the supportive and palliative oncology literature: a focused analysis on randomized controlled trials45 cited
2009Reporting experiments in homeopathic basic research (REHBaR) – A detailed guideline for authors43 cited
2015Assessment of the Quality of Reporting of Randomised Controlled Trials in Otorhinolaryngologic Literature – Adherence to the CONSORT Statement40 cited
2014Assessing blinding in trials of psychiatric disorders: A meta-analysis based on blinding index37 cited
2017Assessing reporting quality of randomized controlled trial abstracts in psychiatry: Adherence to CONSORT for abstracts: A systematic review35 cited
2011Quality of Reporting of Neonatal and Infant Trials in High-Impact Journals30 cited
2016Abstracts reporting of HIV/AIDS randomized controlled trials in general medicine and infectious diseases journals: completeness to date and improvement in the quality since CONSORT extension for abstracts29 cited
2009The Use of the Intention-to-Treat Principle in Nursing Clinical Trials28 cited
2014Reporting quality of randomized controlled trials in orthodontics—what affects it and did it improve over the last 10 years?25 cited
2018Enhancing primary reports of randomized controlled trials: Three most common challenges and suggested solutions23 cited
2012The quality of reporting of RCTs used within a postoperative pain management meta-analysis, using the CONSORT statement23 cited
2015Impact of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist on reporting of randomized clinical trials in traditional Chinese medicine22 cited