SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Evaluation of Uncertainties Associated with Geocoding Techniques
2 references·16 citing·44 second hop
Evaluation of Uncertainties Associated with Geocoding Techniques (2004)Evaluation of Uncertainties Associated wi…On the accuracy of TIGER-type geocoded address data in relation to cadastral and census areal units (2001)On the accuracy of TIGER-type…Guidelines for evaluating and expressing the uncertainty of NIST measurement results (1994)Guidelines for evaluating and…Creating open source composite geocoders: Pitfalls and opportunities (2021)Creating open source composit…The use of geocoding for home healthcare application and management an epidemic situation: Case of COVID-19 virus outbreak (2020)The use of geocoding for home…Accuracy and similarity aspects in online geocoding services: a comparative evaluation for Google and Bing maps (2020)Accuracy and similarity aspec…Evaluating two freely available geocoding tools for geographical inconsistencies and geocoding errors (2017)Evaluating two freely availab…Geocoding and Reverse Geocoding (2016)Geocoding and Reverse Geocodi…Geographic disparity of positional errors and matching rate of residential addresses among geocoding solutions (2015)Geographic disparity of posit…Spatial weighting improves accuracy in small-area demographic forecasts of urban census tract populations (2014)Spatial weighting improves ac…A comparative analysis of routes generated by Web Mapping APIs (2014)A comparative analysis of rou…Reference data and geocoding quality (2013)Reference data and geocoding …Pedestrian Navigation Services: Challenges and Current Trends (2013)Pedestrian Navigation Service…An evaluation framework for comparing geocoding systems (2013)An evaluation framework for c…Accuracy and privacy aspects in free online reverse geocoding services (2013)Accuracy and privacy aspects …Geocoding Recommender: An Algorithm to Recommend Optimal Online Geocoding Services for Applications (2011)Geocoding Recommender: An Alg…Influence of street reference data on geocoding quality (2010)Influence of street reference…Geocoding Accuracy Considerations in Determining Residency Restrictions for Sex Offenders (2009)Geocoding Accuracy Considerat…Quantifying geocode location error using GIS methods (2007)Quantifying geocode location …Positional error in automated geocoding of residential addresses (2003)TRAJECTORIES OF CRIME AT PLACES: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF STREET SEGMENTS IN THE CITY OF SEATTLE* (2004)GIS and Crime Mapping (2005)Turkish street addressing system and geocoding challenges (2013)Kernel density estimation and hotspot mapping (2014)Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography (2007)How Good is Volunteered Geographical Information? A Comparative Study of OpenStreetMap and Ordnance Survey Datasets (2010)Geographic information systems and science (2011)Geocoding Fundamentals and Associated Challenges (2017)Challenges in Geocoding: An Analysis of R Packages and Web Scraping Approaches (2024)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Uncertainty in Geographical Information (2002)Visualizing Geospatial Information Uncertainty: What We Know and What We Need to Know (2005)Residential Proximity to Schools and Daycares (2010)The Impact of Community Notification on Sex Offender Reintegration (2010)Error propagation models to examine the effects of geocoding quality on spatial analysis of individual-level datasets (2012)Interactive Spatial Data Analysis (1995)Interactive spatial data analysis (1996)Geocoding crime and a first estimate of a minimum acceptable hit rate (2004)Crime Measures and the Spatial Analysis of Criminal Activity (2005)On the use of ZIP codes and ZIP code tabulation areas (ZCTAs) for the spatial analysis of epidemiological data. (2006)Associations between Self-Reported and Objective Physical Environmental Factors and Use of a Community Rail-Trail (2001)Zip Code Caveat: Bias Due to Spatiotemporal Mismatches Between Zip Codes and US Census–Defined Geographic Areas—The Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project (2002)An effective and efficient approach for manually improving geocoded data (2008)Validation of a GIS Facilities Database: Quantification and Implications of Error (2008)Quantifying the magnitude of environmental exposure misclassification when using imprecise address proxies in public health research (2012)Geocoding and Monitoring of US Socioeconomic Inequalities in Mortality and Cancer Incidence: Does the Choice of Area-based Measure and Geographic Level Matter?: The Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project (2002)Spatializing 6,000 years of global urbanization from 3700 BC to AD 2000 (2016)Inferring spatial interaction patterns from sequential snapshots of spatial distributions (2017)Minimum geocoding match rates: an international study of the impact of data and areal unit sizes (2020)On the wrong side of the tracts? Evaluating the accuracy of geocoding in public health research (2001)Modeling the probability distribution of positional errors incurred by residential address geocoding. (2007)Geocoding for public health research: Empirical comparison of two geocoding services applied to Canadian cities (2014)Advances in Record-Linkage Methodology as Applied to Matching the 1985 Census of Tampa, Florida (1989)Web Mapping 2.0: The Neogeography of the GeoWeb (2008)Map mashups, Web 2.0 and the GIS revolution (2010)Estimating O–D travel time matrix by Google Maps API: implementation, advantages, and implications (2011)Spatial Accessibility Patterns to Public Hospitals in Shanghai: An Improved Gravity Model (2022)Accessibility in a multiple transport mode urban park based on the “D-D” model: A case study in Park City, Chengdu (2023)Towards healthcare access equality: Understanding spatial accessibility to healthcare services for wheelchair users (2023)Statistics for Experimenters (1979)Constructing Probability Boxes and Dempster-Shafer Structures (2003)CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2002 (2005)Guidelines for evaluating and expressing the uncertainty of NIST measurement results (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1994Guidelines for evaluating and expressing the uncertainty of NIST measurement results2,832 cited
  • 2001On the accuracy of TIGER-type geocoded address data in relation to cadastral and census areal units159 cited

Cited by

  • 2007Quantifying geocode location error using GIS methods60 cited
  • 2013Accuracy and privacy aspects in free online reverse geocoding services52 cited
  • 2009Geocoding Accuracy Considerations in Determining Residency Restrictions for Sex Offenders46 cited
  • 2013Reference data and geocoding quality41 cited
  • 2013An evaluation framework for comparing geocoding systems40 cited
  • 2010Influence of street reference data on geocoding quality37 cited
  • 2015Geographic disparity of positional errors and matching rate of residential addresses among geocoding solutions31 cited
  • 2014A comparative analysis of routes generated by Web Mapping APIs30 cited
  • 2011Geocoding Recommender: An Algorithm to Recommend Optimal Online Geocoding Services for Applications25 cited
  • 2020Accuracy and similarity aspects in online geocoding services: a comparative evaluation for Google and Bing maps24 cited
  • 2017Evaluating two freely available geocoding tools for geographical inconsistencies and geocoding errors20 cited
  • 2013Pedestrian Navigation Services: Challenges and Current Trends

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

17 cited
  • 2016Geocoding and Reverse Geocoding16 cited
  • 2014Spatial weighting improves accuracy in small-area demographic forecasts of urban census tract populations15 cited
  • 2021Creating open source composite geocoders: Pitfalls and opportunities13 cited
  • 2020The use of geocoding for home healthcare application and management an epidemic situation: Case of COVID-19 virus outbreak8 cited