SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Evaluating the Quality of Reporting Occupational Therapy Randomized Controlled Trials by Expanding the CONSORT Criteria
11 references·3 citing·39 second hop
Evaluating the Quality of Reporting Occupational Therapy Randomized Controlled Trials by Expanding the CONSORT Criteria (2006)Evaluating the Quality of Reporting Occup…Opportunities and challenges for improving the quality of reporting clinical research: CONSORT and beyond (2004)Opportunities and challenges …Compliance with the CONSORT checklist in obstetric anaesthesia randomised controlled trials (2004)Compliance with the CONSORT c…Quality of Reporting of Randomized Trials as a Measure of Methodologic Quality (2002)Quality of Reporting of Rando…Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials (2001)Use of the CONSORT Statement …The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement…The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)The CONSORT Statement: Revise…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Improving the quality of repo…Statistical Methodology for the Concurrent Assessment of Interrater and Intrarater Reliability: Using Goniometric Measurements as an Example (1994)Statistical Methodology for t…Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Intraclass correlations: Uses…An Application of Hierarchical Kappa-type Statistics in the Assessment of Majority Agreement among Multiple Observers (1977)An Application of Hierarchica…Quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in chiropractic using the CONSORT checklist (2016)Quality of reporting of rando…Quality and Reporting of Cluster Randomized Controlled Trials Evaluating Occupational Therapy Interventions (2015)Quality and Reporting of Clus…Leitlinien für Forschungsberichte sind auch für Leser medizinischer Fachartikel hilfreich (2009)Leitlinien für Forschungsberi…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Bad reporting does not mean bad methods for randomised trials: observational study of randomised controlled trials performed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (2004)The Number, Quality, and Coverage of Randomized Controlled Trials in Nephrology (2004)The effects of excluding patients from the analysis in randomised controlled trials: meta-epidemiological study (2009)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Review: Benzodiazepines in generalized anxiety disorder: heterogeneity of outcomes based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials (2007)Developing a reporting guideline for social and psychological intervention trials (2013)Reporting quality of N-of-1 trials published between 1985 and 2013: a systematic review (2016)Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (1963)Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. (2003)Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (2006)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)ON THE METHODS AND THEORY OF RELIABILITY (1976)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Use of the Standard Error as a Reliability Index of Interest: An Applied Example Using Elbow Flexor Strength Data (1997)Linking Clinical Relevance and Statistical significance in Evaluating Intra-Individual Changes in Health-Related Quality of Life (1999)The minimal detectable change cannot reliably replace the minimal important difference (2009)Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests (1951)Statistical principles in experimental design. (1962)Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores (1969)The job demands-resources model of burnout. (2001)A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research (2016)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions. (2008)Fundamental Movement Skills in Children and Adolescents (2010)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Measurement of Observer Agreement (2003)Computing inter‐rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement (2006)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1979Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.23,882 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials5,372 cited
  • 1977An Application of Hierarchical Kappa-type Statistics in the Assessment of Majority Agreement among Multiple Observers4,327 cited
  • 2001The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration3,828 cited
  • 1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials1,426 cited
  • 2001Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials1,026 cited
  • 1994Statistical Methodology for the Concurrent Assessment of Interrater and Intrarater Reliability: Using Goniometric Measurements as an Example636 cited
  • 2002Quality of Reporting of Randomized Trials as a Measure of Methodologic Quality397 cited
  • 2004Opportunities and challenges for improving the quality of reporting clinical research: CONSORT and beyond85 cited
  • 2004Compliance with the CONSORT checklist in obstetric anaesthesia randomised controlled trials37 cited

Cited by

  • 2016Quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in chiropractic using the CONSORT checklist22 cited
  • 2015Quality and Reporting of Cluster Randomized Controlled Trials Evaluating Occupational Therapy Interventions

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

15 cited
  • 2009Leitlinien für Forschungsberichte sind auch für Leser medizinischer Fachartikel hilfreich8 cited