Iteration Principles in Epistemology I: Arguments For

Daniel Greco

38 citations0/0 files storedPhilosophy Compass

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics Philosophy and Theoretical Science Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge

Abstract

Abstract Epistemic iteration principles are principles according to which some or another epistemic operator automatically iterates‐‐‐e.g., if it is known that P, then it is known that P, or there is evidence that P, then there is evidence that there is evidence that P. This article provides a survey of various arguments for and against epistemic iteration principles, with a focus on arguments relevant to a wide range of such principles.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 38 citations exist upstream.

References

2000Knowledge and Its Limits 1976Agreeing to Disagree 1983Elements of discourse understanding . Edited by Aravind K. Joshi, Bonnie L. Webber, and Ivan A. Sag. Cambridge: University Press, 1981. Pp. ix, 341. $32.50.1963KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF: An Introduction to the Logic of the Two Notions 2002Belief's Own Ethics 1992The electronic mail game: Strategic behavior under “almost common knowledge”2013Structural Models of Nonequilibrium Strategic Thinking: Theory, Evidence, and Applications 2019The Epistemic Role of Consciousness

Cited by

2022Thinking and being sure *

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.