SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Exploring the pragmatic and explanatory study design on outcomes of systematic reviews of public health interventions: a case study on obesity prevention trials
5 references·6 citing·46 second hop
Exploring the pragmatic and explanatory study design on outcomes of systematic reviews of public health interventions: a case study on obesity prevention trials (2014)Exploring the pragmatic and explanatory s…Pragmatic vs. explanatory: An adaptation of the PRECIS tool helps to judge the applicability of systematic reviews for daily practice (2011)Pragmatic vs. explanatory: An…Assessing applicability when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program (2011)Assessing applicability when …A simple and valid tool distinguished efficacy from effectiveness studies (2006)A simple and valid tool disti…Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines (2002)Conducting systematic reviews…An Application of Hierarchical Kappa-type Statistics in the Assessment of Majority Agreement among Multiple Observers (1977)An Application of Hierarchica…Implementation of e–Mental Health Interventions for Informal Caregivers of Adults With Chronic Diseases: Mixed Methods Systematic Review With a Qualitative Comparative Analysis and Thematic Synthesis (2022)Implementation of e–Mental He…A review of pragmatic trials found a high degree of diversity in design and scope, deficiencies in reporting and trial registry data, and poor indexing (2021)A review of pragmatic trials …A comparison of meta-analytic methods for synthesizing evidence from explanatory and pragmatic trials (2018)A comparison of meta-analytic…The role of pragmatism in explaining heterogeneity in meta-analyses of randomised trials: a protocol for a cross-sectional methodological review (2017)The role of pragmatism in exp…Time to consider sharing data extracted from trials included in systematic reviews (2016)Time to consider sharing data…Reducing research waste and improving research impact (2015)Reducing research waste and i…The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Generalizability of systematic reviews of the effectiveness of health care interventions to primary health care: concepts, methods and future research (2012)Understanding the applicability of results from primary care trials: lessons learned from applying PRECIS-2 (2017)External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?” (2005)AHRQ Series Paper 5: Grading the strength of a body of evidence when comparing medical interventions—Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the Effective Health-Care Program (2009)Meta-analysis of individual participant data: rationale, conduct, and reporting (2010)Observational studies in systemic reviews of comparative effectiveness: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program (2011)Behavioral Interventions and Counseling to Prevent Child Abuse and Neglect: A Systematic Review to Update the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation (2013)Clinical replicability of rehabilitation interventions in randomized controlled trials reported in main journals is inadequate (2019)Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)Interpretation of Changes in Health-related Quality of Life (2003)Novel methods to deal with publication biases: secondary analysis of antidepressant trials in the FDA trial registry database and related journal publications (2009)A meta-analysis of nonrandomized effectiveness studies on outpatient cognitive behavioral therapy for adult anxiety disorders (2013)Do Evidence-Based Interventions Work When Tested in the “Real World?” A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Parent Management Training for the Treatment of Child Disruptive Behavior (2013)Implementation, Sustainability, and Scaling Up of Social-Emotional and Academic Innovations in Public Schools (2003)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Mapping of available health research and development data: what's there, what's missing, and what role is there for a global observatory? (2013)What is generated and what is used: a description of public health research output and citation: Table 1 (2016)Systematic reviews are rarely used to inform study design - a systematic review and meta-analysis (2022)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)Screening for Depression in Medical Settings with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ): A Diagnostic Meta-Analysis (2007)Optimal cut-off score for diagnosing depression with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9): a meta-analysis (2011)A diagnostic meta-analysis of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) algorithm scoring method as a screen for depression (2014)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)A Web-based archive of systematic review data (2012)Editorial: Systematic review automation thematic series (2019)Reproducibility and replicability of systematic reviews (2019)Methodological standards for conducting and reporting meta-analyses: Ensuring the replicability of meta-analyses of pharmacist-led medication review (2021)Hierarchy of evidence: a framework for ranking evidence evaluating healthcare interventions (2002)Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement (2008)Comparison of registered and published outcomes in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review (2015)Update on Trial Registration 11 Years after the ICMJE Policy Was Established (2017)An analysis of published trials found that current use of pragmatic trial labels is uninformative (2022)The representation of Indigenous peoples in chronic disease clinical trials in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States (2022)The CES-D Scale (1977)The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (1983)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Healthcare Workers Mental Health and e-Health: A Scoping Review (2024)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Measurement of Observer Agreement (2003)Computing inter‐rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement (2006)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1977An Application of Hierarchical Kappa-type Statistics in the Assessment of Majority Agreement among Multiple Observers4,327 cited
  • 2002Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines960 cited
  • 2006A simple and valid tool distinguished efficacy from effectiveness studies207 cited
  • 2011Assessing applicability when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program87 cited
  • 2011Pragmatic vs. explanatory: An adaptation of the PRECIS tool helps to judge the applicability of systematic reviews for daily practice56 cited

Cited by

  • 2015Reducing research waste and improving research impact45 cited
  • 2021A review of pragmatic trials found a high degree of diversity in design and scope, deficiencies in reporting and trial registry data, and poor indexing32 cited
  • 2016Time to consider sharing data extracted from trials included in systematic reviews30 cited
  • 2018A comparison of meta-analytic methods for synthesizing evidence from explanatory and pragmatic trials20 cited
  • 2022Implementation of e–Mental Health Interventions for Informal Caregivers of Adults With Chronic Diseases: Mixed Methods Systematic Review With a Qualitative Comparative Analysis and Thematic Synthesis18 cited
  • 2017The role of pragmatism in explaining heterogeneity in meta-analyses of randomised trials: a protocol for a cross-sectional methodological review15 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work