Playing Cournot although they shouldn?tMiguel Alexandre Fonseca, Steffen Huck, Hans‐Theo Normann2004-06-23articleEconomic Theory58 citationsclosedNo readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.Experimental Behavioral Economics StudiesMerger and Competition AnalysisGame Theory and ApplicationsAbstractNo abstract was published for this record.Citations in this libraryStored only when both papers are in the corpus — 58 citations exist upstream.References1988A General Theory of Equilibrium Selection in Games1990Endogenous timing in duopoly games: Stackelberg or cournot equilibria2003Two are few and four are many: number effects in experimental oligopolies1987Theory and Misbehavior of First-Price Auctions2001The Relevance of Equal Splits in Ultimatum Games1999Endogenous Stackelberg Leadership2001Stackelberg Beats Cournot: On Collusion and Efficiency in Experimental Markets*1993Endogenous Sequencing of Firm DecisionsCited by20162. Using Experimental Methods to Understand Why and How We Give to Charity2005Endogenous Timing in Duopoly: Experimental Evidence2010“A profit table or a profit calculator?” A note on the design of Cournot oligopoly experiments2005Allowing for two production periods in the Cournot duopoly: Experimental evidence2018Collusion and bargaining in asymmetric Cournot duopoly—An experiment2011E ndogenous M ove S tructure and V oluntary P rovision of P ublic G oods : T heory and E xperiment2009Price leadership and firm size asymmetry: an experimental analysis2008Making sense of the experimental evidence on endogenous timing in duopoly markets