SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Are clustering effects accounted for in statistical analysis in leading dental specialty journals?
0 references·13 citing·47 second hop
Are clustering effects accounted for in statistical analysis in leading dental specialty journals? (2012)Are clustering effects accounted for in s…Pay attention to the analysis: Common statistical errors in orthodontic randomised clinical trials (2024)Pay attention to the analysis…Quality of Split-Mouth Trials in Dentistry: 1998, 2008, and 2018 (2020)Quality of Split-Mouth Trials…Dental Research Waste in Design, Analysis, and Reporting: A Scoping Review (2020)Dental Research Waste in Desi…Methods, transparency and reporting of clinical trials in orthodontics and periodontics (2019)Methods, transparency and rep…A priori power considerations in orthodontic research: a 3 year meta-epidemiologic study (2019)A priori power considerations…Statistical testing against baseline in orthodontic research: a meta-epidemiologic study (2018)Statistical testing against b…Evidence of insufficient quality of reporting in patent landscapes in the life sciences (2017)Evidence of insufficient qual…The Quality of the Evidence According to GRADE Is Predominantly Low or Very Low in Oral Health Systematic Reviews (2015)The Quality of the Evidence A…The CONSORT Statement: Application within and adaptations for orthodontic trials (2015)The CONSORT Statement: Applic…Statistical testing against baseline was common in dental research (2015)Statistical testing against b…Randomized controlled trials in dentistry: Common pitfalls and how to avoid them (2014)Randomized controlled trials …Methodological characteristics and treatment effect sizes in oral health randomised controlled trials: Is there a relationship? Protocol for a meta-epidemiological study (2014)Methodological characteristic…Importance of Transparent Reporting of Health Research (2014)Importance of Transparent Rep…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)What is a meta-epidemiological study? Analysis of published literature indicated heterogeneous study designs and definitions (2020)Faculty appointment and promotion in Taiwan’s medical schools, a systematic analysis (2022)One-Third of Systematic Reviews in Rehabilitation Applied the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) System to Evaluate Certainty of Evidence: A Meta-Research Study (2022)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)The use of tailored subheadings was successful in enhancing compliance with CONSORT in a dental journal (2017)Outcome reporting discrepancies between trial entries and published final reports of orthodontic randomized controlled trials (2018)Current trends in orthodontic journals listed in Journal Citation Reports. A bibliometric study (2019)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Transparency of outcome reporting and trial registration of randomized controlled trials in top psychosomatic and behavioral health journals: A 5-year follow-up (2015)Reporting transparency: making the ethical mandate explicit (2016)Completeness of Reporting Is Suboptimal in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Rehabilitation Journals, With Trials With Low Risk of Bias Displaying Better Reporting: A Meta-research Study (2022)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Publication bias in randomized controlled trials in dentistry. What factors affect statistical significance of outcomes? (2022)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies (2008)Reporting quality of randomised controlled trials published in prosthodontic and implantology journals (2015)How do we create, and improve, the evidence base? (2016)Publication pattern, study design, authors and countries involved in orthodontic RCTs – a bibliometric MEDLINE survey over the past 50 years (2019)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Improving transparency and reproducibility of patent landscapes: the Reporting Items for Patent Landscapes (RIPL) statement and other considerations (2020)Patent intelligence of RNA viruses: Implications for combating emerging and re-emerging RNA virus based infectious diseases (2022)What, Where, When and How of COVID-19 Patents Landscape: A Bibliometrics Review (2022)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2011)Promoting an open research culture (2015)The reporting quality of split-mouth trials in orthodontics according to CONSORT guidelines: 2015–19 (2020)Transparency in clinical trials: Adding value to paediatric dental research (2020)Research transparency in dental research: A programmatic analysis (2022)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)THE REPORTING QUALITY OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEW ABSTRACTS IN LEADING GENERAL DENTAL JOURNALS: A METHODOLOGICAL STUDY (2022)“Spin” among abstracts of randomized controlled trials in sleep medicine: a research-on-research study (2023)Mapping of available health research and development data: what's there, what's missing, and what role is there for a global observatory? (2013)Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis (2014)Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)The presence and characteristics of ‘spin’ among randomized controlled trial abstracts in orthodontics (2021)Evaluating dental AI research papers: Key considerations for editors and reviewers (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2020Dental Research Waste in Design, Analysis, and Reporting: A Scoping Review58 cited
  • 2015The CONSORT Statement: Application within and adaptations for orthodontic trials52 cited
  • 2014Importance of Transparent Reporting of Health Research43 cited
  • 2019Methods, transparency and reporting of clinical trials in orthodontics and periodontics40 cited
  • 2014Randomized controlled trials in dentistry: Common pitfalls and how to avoid them40 cited
  • 2015The Quality of the Evidence According to GRADE Is Predominantly Low or Very Low in Oral Health Systematic Reviews37 cited
  • 2017Evidence of insufficient quality of reporting in patent landscapes in the life sciences23 cited
  • 2020Quality of Split-Mouth Trials in Dentistry: 1998, 2008, and 201823 cited
  • 2015Statistical testing against baseline was common in dental research15 cited
  • 2018Statistical testing against baseline in orthodontic research: a meta-epidemiologic study11 cited
  • 2014Methodological characteristics and treatment effect sizes in oral health randomised controlled trials: Is there a relationship? Protocol for a meta-epidemiological study9 cited
  • 2024Pay attention to the analysis: Common statistical errors in orthodontic randomised clinical trials8 cited
  • 2019A priori power considerations in orthodontic research: a 3 year meta-epidemiologic study

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

8 cited