References

• 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials5,372 cited
• 2005External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?”2,541 cited
• 1997The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials2,052 cited
• 2004Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials1,845 cited
• 2003Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses944 cited
• 1997Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects820 cited
• 2005Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals472 cited
• 2004Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors408 cited
• 1992Measured Enthusiasm: Does the Method of Reporting Trial Results Alter Perceptions of Therapeutic Effectiveness?377 cited
• 1999Users' Guides to the Medical Literature359 cited
• 2004Clinical Trial Registration: A Statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors264 cited
• 1998Users' Guides to the Medical Literature252 cited
• 1987Confronting publication bias: A cohort design for meta‐analysis216 cited