SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Decision-Making Constraints and Processes of Grant Peer Review, and Their Effects on the Review Outcome
2 references·16 citing·55 second hopsampled
The Decision-Making Constraints and Processes of Grant Peer Review, and Their Effects on the Review Outcome (2001)The Decision-Making Constraints and Proce…New Light on Old Boys: Cognitive and Institutional Particularism in the Peer Review System (1991)New Light on Old Boys: Cognit…Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system (1977)Publication prejudices: An ex…Co-existing Notions of Research Quality: A Framework to Study Context-specific Understandings of Good Research (2019)Co-existing Notions of Resear…What do we know about grant peer review in the health sciences? (2018)What do we know about grant p…Author-Reviewer Homophily in Peer Review (2018)Author-Reviewer Homophily in …Governing Science (2016)Governing ScienceSocietal impact evaluation: Exploring evaluator perceptions of the characterization of impact under the REF2014: Table 1. (2015)Societal impact evaluation: E…Is There a Relationship between Research Sponsorship and Publication Impact? An Analysis of Funding Acknowledgments in Nanotechnology Papers (2015)Is There a Relationship betwe…Commensuration Bias in Peer Review (2015)Commensuration Bias in Peer R…Conservatism and risk-taking in peer review: Emerging ERC practices (2012)Conservatism and risk-taking …A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability and Its Determinants (2010)A Reliability-Generalization …Past performance, peer review and project selection: a case study in the social and behavioral sciences (2009)Past performance, peer review…An Outline of the Bibliometric Indicator Used for Performance-Based Funding of Research Institutions in Norway (2009)An Outline of the Bibliometri…How to sponsor ground-breaking research: a comparison of funding schemes (2008)How to sponsor ground-breakin…Changing Governance of the Public Sciences (2007)Changing Governance of the Pu…The ‘Quality Myth’: Promoting and Hindering Conditions for Acquiring Research Funds (2006)The ‘Quality Myth’: Promoting…Assessing expert interdisciplinary work at the frontier: an empirical exploration (2006)Assessing expert interdiscipl…Optimal Allocation of Proposals to Reviewers to Facilitate Effective Ranking (2005)Optimal Allocation of Proposa…Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines (1991)The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (1995)The Economics of Industrial Innovation (2012)The representation of the social sciences and humanities in the Web of Science--a comparison of publication patterns and incentive structures in Flanders and Norway (2005-9) (2012)Accounting for Impact? The Journal Impact Factor and the Making of Biomedical Research in the Netherlands (2015)Academic Misconduct, Misrepresentation and Gaming: A Reassessment (2018)Progress and its problems towards a theory of scientific growth (1977)Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Epistemic cultures: how the sciences make knowledge (1999)Beyond breakthrough research: Epistemic properties of research and their consequences for research funding (2014)Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system (1971)Knowledge and Social Imagery (1977)The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences (1986)Here and Everywhere: Sociology of Scientific Knowledge (1995)Combining Methods in Educational and Social Research (2004)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2009)The N-Pact Factor: Evaluating the Quality of Empirical Journals with Respect to Sample Size and Statistical Power (2014)Professional and citizen bibliometrics: complementarities and ambivalences in the development and use of indicators—a state-of-the-art report (2016)The application of meta-analytic (multi-level) models with multiple random effects: A systematic review (2020)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)Games Real Actors Play: Actor-centered Institutionalism In Policy Research (1997)The discourse of meritocracy contested/reproduced: Foreign women academics in UK business schools (2013)Unpacking the Matthew effect in citations (2014)How to avoid borrowed plumes in academia (2019)Knowledge and Human Interests (1968)Reason, Truth and History (1981)The New production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies (1995)Targeted Assessment of Students' Interdisciplinary Work: An Empirically Grounded Framework Proposed (2007)Quality criteria and indicators for responsible research and innovation: learning from transdisciplinarity (2014)Learning to collaborate while collaborating: advancing interdisciplinary sustainability research (2019)The American Psychological Association (1919)Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. (1971)Cognitive Therapy and the Emotional Disorders (1975)Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. (1979)Toward an Integration of Cognitive and Motivational Perspectives on Social Inference: A Biased Hypothesis-Testing Model (1987)Decision Making in Health and Medicine: Integrating Evidence and Values (2001)Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts (1986)Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (1995)Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations (2012)The Impact of Changing Funding and Authority Relationships on Scientific Innovations (2018)Exploring why global health needs are unmet by research efforts: the potential influences of geography, industry and publication incentives (2020)Data, measurement and empirical methods in the science of science (2023)Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 (1989)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Changing research on research evaluation: A critical literature review to revisit the agenda (2020)No time for that now! Qualitative changes in manuscript peer review during the Covid-19 pandemic (2020)Interpreting Bibliometric Data (2021)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)How the entire scientific community can confront gender bias in the workplace (2018)The unequal impact of parenthood in academia (2021)Exploring Gender Bias in Six Key Domains of Academic Science: An Adversarial Collaboration (2023)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 1977Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system1,013 cited
  • 1991New Light on Old Boys: Cognitive and Institutional Particularism in the Peer Review System248 cited

Cited by

  • 2010A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability and Its Determinants232 cited
  • 2016Governing Science186 cited
  • 2012Conservatism and risk-taking in peer review: Emerging ERC practices185 cited
  • 2006Assessing expert interdisciplinary work at the frontier: an empirical exploration175 cited
  • 2018Author-Reviewer Homophily in Peer Review169 cited
  • 2019Co-existing Notions of Research Quality: A Framework to Study Context-specific Understandings of Good Research151 cited
  • 2006The ‘Quality Myth’: Promoting and Hindering Conditions for Acquiring Research Funds132 cited
  • 2007Changing Governance of the Public Sciences130 cited
  • 2008How to sponsor ground-breaking research: a comparison of funding schemes129 cited
  • 2015Is There a Relationship between Research Sponsorship and Publication Impact? An Analysis of Funding Acknowledgments in Nanotechnology Papers122 cited
  • 2009Past performance, peer review and project selection: a case study in the social and behavioral sciences109 cited
  • 2009

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

An Outline of the Bibliometric Indicator Used for Performance-Based Funding of Research Institutions in Norway
107 cited
  • 2018What do we know about grant peer review in the health sciences?102 cited
  • 2015Societal impact evaluation: Exploring evaluator perceptions of the characterization of impact under the REF2014: Table 1.99 cited
  • 2005Optimal Allocation of Proposals to Reviewers to Facilitate Effective Ranking96 cited
  • 2015Commensuration Bias in Peer Review89 cited